Infant Mortality through the Years

Posted by Rena Xu • January 21st, 2015

Prematurity has long been recognized as a major contributor to infant mortality. One in every four infants born extremely prematurely (between 22 and 29 weeks’ gestation) does not survive. A large number die within the first 12 hours after birth, and many more never make it out of the hospital, most commonly dying from a respiratory condition.

Efforts have been made to improve the prognosis for these infants. Neonatal care has evolved in its use of glucocorticoids, antibiotics, surfactant, and ventilation, to name just a few examples of interventions targeting pulmonary-related deaths. Have these changes in practice changed the state of infant mortality?

A study published this week in NEJM looked at the incidence and causes of death among extremely premature infants from 2000 to 2011. The investigators prospectively collected data on over 22,000 extremely premature infants born in one of 25 Neonatal Research Centers. They followed them from birth to 120 days (or to death, discharge, or hospital transfer, if one of these occurred first). If hospitalized for more than 120 days, infants were evaluated for death until 1 year of age.

Roughly one fourth of the infants died during their birth hospitalization (6075 deaths). Over 40% of deaths occurred in the first 12 hours after birth. Earlier gestational age at birth was linked to a worse outcome; infants who died had a mean gestational age a little over 24 weeks, versus 26 weeks in the infants who survived. Their mothers were also less likely to have received prenatal glucocorticoids (62% versus 88%).

Overall, through the years, mortality declined. The number of deaths per 1000 live births was 275 in the 2000-2003 period; 285 in the 2004-2007 period; and 258 in the 2008-2011 period (P=0.003). The study detected significant changes in neonatal care across these periods. There was an increase in the percentage of women receiving any prenatal care, as well as the percentage receiving prenatal glucocorticoids. Use of prenatal antibiotics decreased, while use of high-frequency ventilation increased, more than doubling among the most premature infants.

Trends in cause of mortality also shifted. The number of deaths attributed to respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia decreased from the 2000-2003 period to the 2008-2011 period (from 83 to 68 per 1000 live births). This decrease accounted for more than half the decline in overall mortality. The number of deaths attributed to immaturity, infection, or central nervous system injury also fell. There was, however, an increase in the number of deaths attributed to necrotizing enterocolitis (from 23 to 30 per 1000 live births).

“The increase in mortality attributed to necrotizing enterocolitis may be related to improvements in the early survival of infants who would have otherwise died before they reached the typical postnatal age at which necrotizing enterocolitis occurs,” the authors hypothesized.

While this study was not designed to evaluate causality, it identified an improvement in overall and pulmonary-related mortality among extremely premature infants concurrent with changes in neonatal practice. The authors concluded, “Our findings underscore the continued need to develop and implement strategies for reducing the potentially lethal complications of premature birth.”

Abdominal Pain, Syncope, and Hypotension

Posted by Carla Rothaus • January 16th, 2015

In the latest Case Record of the Massachusetts General Hospital, a 25-year-old man was admitted to the hospital because of abdominal pain, syncope, and hypotension that occurred while he was lifting heavy boxes. An abdominal ultrasound examination revealed a hypoechoic lesion in the liver. A diagnostic test was performed.

Rupture or leak of hydatid-cyst fluid due to accidental or surgical trauma or extreme physical activity is a well-documented cause of anaphylaxis. There have been rare cases of anaphylaxis due to spontaneous rupture.

Clinical Pearls

The definitive hosts for E. granulosus are dogs and other canines. Stray dogs often feed on carcasses or offal of slaughtered animals and thus acquire parasites, including cestodes (tapeworms) such as Taenia saginata, T. solium , and four species of echinococcus — Echinococcus granulosus, E. multilocularis, E. vogeli, and E. oligarthrus. These parasites can cause IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. A human becomes the accidental host with the ingestion of infected embryonated eggs shed by stray dogs. The eggs, which contain the infectious oncospheres, penetrate the intestinal wall and enter the bloodstream. Although most oncospheres lodge in the liver and develop into hydatid cysts, such cysts can also occur in the lungs, bones, brain, heart, and muscle.

What are the clinical manifestations of hydatid cysts?

Clinical manifestations of hydatid cysts occur after a highly variable incubation period. The majority of persons with hydatid cysts remain asymptomatic for years, but symptoms related to infection of a cyst occur in approximately 25% of such persons. Occasionally, a hydatid cyst of the liver causes problems such as rupture into the biliary tree, obstruction, fibrosis, and enterocutaneous fistula. Hydatid cysts have also been associated with the development of bacterial infection. In rare cases, a cyst ruptures into the peritoneal cavity and causes anaphylaxis.

Morning Report Questions

Q: When imaging shows a suspected hydatid cyst in the liver, how is the diagnosis of echinococcal infection confirmed?

A: In general, diagnostic aspiration is not routinely recommended in patients with hydatid cysts because of the risk of fluid leakage resulting in an anaphylactic reaction and possible dissemination of the disease. Antibody detection is the most commonly used diagnostic method. Sensitivity and specificity vary among tests, depending on the type of antigen and the stage and location of the disease.

Q: How are hydatid cysts treated?

A: The choice of therapy is guided by the radiographic appearance of the cyst and the patient’s clinical symptoms. Small cysts that have a stable cyst wall and no daughter cysts may require only clinical observation without intervention or may be treated with antihelminthic agents alone, whereas large cysts with multiple septations or daughter cysts typically require invasive intervention. For large cysts (>5 cm in diameter) or those that are complex, patients may undergo surgery (either cystectomy or partial liver resection) or percutaneous aspiration by means of the PAIR (puncture, aspirate, inject, and reaspirate) procedure. The PAIR procedure is performed by inserting a catheter through the germinal layer of the cyst, aspirating the contents, injecting fluid that is lethal to the protoscolices (e.g., ethanol or hypertonic saline), and then repeatedly flushing the cyst. Surgery is favored for cysts with many compartments that may not be amenable to complete evacuation and for very large cysts that cause compressive symptoms; surgery is also favored when cysts are in close proximity to the biliary tree, because the PAIR procedure can result in leakage of cyst contents or scolicidal solution into the biliary system, causing cholangitis.

Multiple-System Atrophy

Posted by Carla Rothaus • January 16th, 2015

Multiple-system atrophy is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive autonomic failure, parkinsonism, and cerebellar and pyramidal tract symptoms. Glial cytoplasmic inclusions of α-synuclein are a defining histologic feature. There is no curative treatment. A new review on this topic comes from Innsbruck Medical University’s Alessandra Fanciulli, M.D., and Gregor K. Wenning, M.D., Ph.D.

Multiple-system atrophy is an adult-onset, fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive autonomic failure, parkinsonian features, and cerebellar and pyramidal features in various combinations. It is classified as the parkinsonian subtype if parkinsonism is the predominant feature and as the cerebellar subtype if cerebellar features predominate.

Clinical Pearls

What is known about the epidemiology and pathogenesis of multiple-system atrophy?

The estimated mean incidence is 0.6 to 0.7 cases per 100,000 person-years, with a range of 0.1 to 2.4 cases per 100,000 person-years. Cases of the parkinsonian subtype outnumber cases of the cerebellar subtype in most countries by 2:1 to 4:1, although the cerebellar subtype is more frequent in Japan, with genetic or epigenetic factors possibly exerting an influence. Disease onset is usually in the sixth decade of life, with both sexes equally affected. The mean survival from the onset of symptoms is 6 to 10 years, with few patients surviving more than 15 years. No environmental factors are known to affect the risk of multiple-system atrophy. Multiple-system atrophy is generally considered a sporadic disease. Variable degrees of olivopontocerebellar atrophy and striatonigral degeneration are typically found at postmortem examination of patients with multiple-system atrophy, which broadly reflect the presence of ataxia and parkinsonism during life. Although the pathogenic mechanisms underlying multiple-system atrophy remain partially unclear, converging evidence from preclinical models and postmortem studies suggests that it is a primary oligodendrogliopathy. Proteinaceous oligodendroglial cytoplasmic inclusions (also called Papp–Lantos bodies) are the histologic hallmark of multiple-system atrophy.

What are the motor and non-motor features of multiple-system atrophy?

Like Parkinson’s disease, multiple-system atrophy has a prodromal premotor phase in 20 to 75% of cases. Parkinsonism, with slowness of movements, rigidity, and a tendency to fall, characterizes the motor presentation of the parkinsonian subtype of multiple-system atrophy. Parkinson-like “pill-rolling” rest tremor is unusual, whereas irregular postural and action tremor with superimposed jerks is seen in as many as 50% of patients with multiple-system atrophy. Cerebellar ataxia predominates in the motor presentation of the cerebellar subtype of multiple-system atrophy. Cerebellar features consist of a wide-based gait, uncoordinated limb movements, action tremor, and spontaneous, gaze-evoked, or positional downbeat nystagmus. Spasticity or pyramidal weakness should cast doubts on a diagnosis of multiple-system atrophy, but generalized hyperreflexia, as well as a Babinski sign, may occur in 30 to 50% of cases. Early and severe autonomic failure is a key feature of multiple-system atrophy, and the most frequently affected domains are urogenital and cardiovascular. Severe orthostatic hypotension, defined as a blood pressure decrease of 30 mm Hg systolic or 15 mm Hg diastolic within 3 minutes after a passive head-up tilt or standing from the recumbent position, is the main feature of cardiovascular autonomic failure in clinically established multiple-system atrophy. Respiratory disturbances are characteristic of multiple-system atrophy. Diurnal or nocturnal inspiratory stridor develops in as many as 50% of patients at some time but is more frequent in advanced disease than in earlier stages, and sleep apneas affect about 40% of patients. Dementia or visual hallucinations are not consistent with a diagnosis of multiple-system atrophy; these symptoms in the presence of parkinsonism and autonomic failure should prompt consideration of dementia with Lewy bodies.

Figure 2. Multidisciplinary Presentation of MSA.

Morning Report Questions

Q: How is multiple-system atrophy diagnosed and treated?

A: Because of its protean manifestations, multiple-system atrophy may be misdiagnosed, especially at disease onset. The consensus guidelines define three degrees of certainty for the diagnosis of multiple-system atrophy: definite, probable, and possible. Only symptomatic therapy is available at present, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches. Unfortunately, the evidence level is low for these approaches, with few exceptions. Most of the commonly used drugs are prescribed off- label.

Table 1. Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple-System Atrophy (MSA).

Q: What is the usual clinical course of a patient diagnosed with multiple-system atrophy?

A: Multiple-system atrophy is characterized by a relentless worsening of motor and nonmotor symptoms during an average time frame of 10 years, with more rapid progression at the onset. Approximately 50% of patients require walking aids within 3 years after the onset of motor symptoms, 60% require a wheelchair after 5 years, and the median time before the patient is bedridden is 6 to 8 years. Counseling patients on life expectancy can be challenging for the treating physician, because there are reports of both aggressive variants with a disease duration of less than 3 years and more benign cases with prolonged survival.

Figure 3. Natural History of MSA.

Complicated Grief

Posted by Carla Rothaus • January 9th, 2015

Complicated grief is intense grief after the death of a loved one that lasts longer than expected according to social norms and causes functional impairment. Psychotherapy directed at the loss and at restoring activities and effective functioning is recommended.

The condition of complicated grief, which is also called prolonged grief disorder, affects about 2 to 3% of the population worldwide. This condition is characterized by intense grief that lasts longer than would be expected according to social norms and that causes impairment in daily functioning. Complicated grief can follow the loss of any close relationship. Clinical experience suggests that without treatment, symptoms of complicated grief diminish slowly and can persist.

Clinical Pearls

What are the symptoms of complicated grief?

The hallmark of complicated grief is persistent, intense yearning, longing, and sadness; these symptoms are usually accompanied by insistent thoughts or images of the deceased and a sense of disbelief or an inability to accept the painful reality of the person’s death. Rumination is common and is often focused on angry or guilty recrimination related to circumstances of the death. Avoidance of situations that serve as reminders of the loss is also common, as is the urge to hold onto the deceased person by constantly reminiscing or by viewing, touching, or smelling the deceased person’s belongings. People with complicated grief often feel shocked, stunned, or emotionally numb, and they may become estranged from others because of the belief that happiness is inextricably tied to the person who died. They may have a diminished sense of self or discomfort with a changed social role and are often confused by their seemingly endless grief.

What are the risk factors for complicated grief?

Risk factors include a history of mood or anxiety disorders, alcohol or drug abuse, and multiple losses. Depression in persons who have been caregivers during a loved one’s terminal illness and depression early in bereavement are predictors of complicated grief later in bereavement. Personal factors such as these may interact with characteristics of the relationship with the deceased or with the circumstances, context, or consequences of the death to increase the risk. Losing someone with whom one has had a close relationship can be especially hard if the bereaved person had a difficult upbringing or if there are unusually stressful consequences of the death, inadequate social supports, serious conflicts with friends or relatives, or major financial problems after the death.

Morning Report Questions

Q: How can clinicians identify patients with complicated grief?

A: Questions about important losses should be part of a standard diagnostic evaluation, especially in the case of older patients, for whom loss is common. Patients are sometimes ashamed of their persistently intense grief, so it is important for clinicians to ask direct questions in a sensitive and empathic way. A semistructured-interview format to facilitate assessment of complicated grief is a shortened version of a validated instrument. The Brief Grief Questionnaire and the Inventory of Complicated Grief are self-report questionnaires that can be used to screen patients for complicated grief. The clinical evaluation of a bereaved person should also include screening for other psychiatric and medical disorders, since coexisting conditions are common.

Table 1. Provisional Proposed Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Prolonged Grief Disorder in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision.

Table 2. Differential Diagnosis of Complicated Grief, Major Depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Q: What treatments are recommended for complicated grief?

A: Randomized, controlled trials have shown that psychotherapy is efficacious for complicated grief, so it is the first-line treatment. A short-term approach called complicated grief treatment is the treatment that has been most extensively studied to date. Its objectives are to identify and resolve complications of grief and to facilitate adaptation to loss. Trials suggest that interventions that include strategies to reduce avoidance of thoughts about the death and avoidance of activities and places that are reminders of the loss are more effective than those that do not. Although data are lacking from randomized trials to inform the use of pharmacotherapy for complicated grief, antidepressant medication is used commonly in practice. Five open-label trials that involved a total of 50 patients suggested improvement in patients who received antidepressants, but not benzodiazepines.

Table 3. Core Components of Treatment for Complicated Grief.

Dengue Vaccine

Posted by Carla Rothaus • January 9th, 2015

Dengue is a mosquito-borne viral illness that causes hundreds of millions of infections each year. No specific therapy exists. In a randomized, controlled trial involving Latin American children, a tetravalent dengue vaccine showed significant protective efficacy.

Several dengue vaccine candidates are in development. As part of the clinical development of a recombinant, live, attenuated, tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV), twin phase 3 clinical trials were initiated in Asia and Latin America to assess the efficacy of a schedule of three doses (administered at 0, 6, and 12 months) against symptomatic, virologically confirmed dengue (VCD).

Clinical Pearls

How have rates of dengue infection in endemic areas changed over the past decade?

Dengue is a mosquito-borne disease that is present in many parts of the world. From 2003 through 2013, the number of dengue cases that were reported to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) increased by a factor of five. The disease is caused by one of four closely related virus serotypes from the genus flavivirus. Mosquitoes that transmit the virus are present in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide and in some temperate areas of the United States, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Dengue is an increasing public   health problem despite efforts to manage epidemics through vector control.

Is there evidence that the CYD-TDV vaccine under development is effective?

In the Latin American trial, the CYD-TDV vaccine had an efficacy of 60.8% against symptomatic VCD after a three-dose vaccination schedule among children between the ages of 9 and 16 years. In the per-protocol analysis, the vaccine efficacy was 60.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.0 to 68.0), on the basis of 176 cases of VCD in the vaccine group and 221 in the control group that were diagnosed more than 28 days after the third dose. In the intention-to-treat         analysis, which included all children who received at least one injection from month 0 to 25, the vaccine efficacy was 64.7% (95% CI, 58.7 to 69.8). These efficacy results are consistent with those of the similarly designed Asian trial.

Table 2. Vaccine Efficacy against Any Serotype of Dengue.

Morning Report Questions

Q: Is the CYD-TDV vaccine effective against all 4 dengue serotypes, and in both seropositive and seronegative recipients?

A: In the two studies, efficacy was higher against serotypes 3 and 4 than against serotypes 1 and 2. In Asia, efficacy against serotype 2 was 35% after the third injection, which was not significant in comparison with placebo, whereas in the Latin American study, the point estimate was 42.3%, which was significant. Efficacy in the small subgroup of children who had seronegative status at baseline was 43.2%, which was not significant in comparison with placebo but was similar to that in the Asian study (35.5%).

Table 3. Serotype-Specific Vaccine Efficacy.

Q: Is this vaccine safe?  

A: In the Latin American study, safety and reactogenicity profiles from 25 months of active surveillance were consistent with previous reports that identified no major concerns. No pattern of serious adverse events was identified.

Table 4. Safety Analysis and Subgroup Analysis of Reactogenicity Events Reported within 28 Days after Any Injection.

New Series: International Health Care Systems

Posted by Karen Buckley • January 5th, 2015

A new series of Perspective articles on the health care systems of selected countries around the world begins with Sweden.

The Public–Private Pendulum in Sweden

The Swedish health care system is largely the product of past Social Democratic governments, which emphasized equity and reliance on the public sector. But since 1990, more centrist governments have turned to privatization, competition, and greater consumer choice.

Working with the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation whose international program in health policy supports its mission of promoting high-performing health care systems in the United States and elsewhere, NEJM has commissioned articles on health policies in place or under development in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, Africa, and Australasia. Each article will present one or several aspects of a national health care system, chosen by the authors as distinctive, new, innovative, or potentially instructive for other countries.

To facilitate comparisons among countries, each entry in the series will include two brief case studies, following two typical patients through the country’s system — one a young, pregnant woman, the other a middle-aged man with a myocardial infarction. In addition, each piece will include a table covering a set of key system parameters. That information will also be used to construct an interactive graphic that permits specific international comparisons.  As the article series builds, so will the breadth and complexity of the graphic.

For more information, read the full editorial introducing the series.  And, look for the next article, on Canada’s health care system, on February 5.

 

Diagnosing One Letter at a Time

Posted by Carla Rothaus • January 2nd, 2015

A 45-year-old woman presented with lower-extremity weakness. She first noted weakness in her ankles and feet 5 months previously. The weakness progressed to involve her knees and hips, and she had been unable to walk without support for the prior 2 months.

Electrodiagnostic studies cannot always classify a neuropathy definitively into an axonal or demyelinating category; in such cases, history and examination are essential in interpreting the results.

Clinical Pearls

What is the POEMS syndrome?

The POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, and skin changes) syndrome is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome associated with a monoclonal plasma-cell dyscrasia. The pathophysiology of the POEMS syndrome is not fully understood, but the overproduction of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines appears to play a major role in the disorder; in particular, there is marked overproduction and secretion of VEGF [vascular endothelial growth factor] by plasma cells. VEGF-induced neovascularity and microvascular permeability are postulated to cause most of the hallmark manifestations of this syndrome. Interleukin-12 is also overproduced in the POEMS syndrome and may play a role in the pathogenesis of the disorder. Sclerotic bone lesions or Castleman’s disease (a rare lymphoproliferative disorder) are present in nearly all patients with the POEMS syndrome. The disease course is chronic and progressive, with a reported median survival of 13.8 years.

What are the diagnostic criteria for the POEMS syndrome?

The diagnosis of the POEMS syndrome requires evidence of a polyneuropathy and a monoclonal plasma-cell proliferative disorder, as well as at least one other major criterion and one minor criterion.

Table 2. Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for the POEMS Syndrome.

Morning Report Questions

Q: Can electrodiagnostic testing distinguish between POEMS syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)?

A: A terminal latency index of 0.38 or more, indicating comparatively less distal demyelination, has good sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing the POEMS syndrome from the more common CIDP. Patients with the POEMS syndrome usually have uniform demyelination, whereas patients with CIDP tend to have multifocal demyelination that is more severe in the proximal and distal nerve segments.

Q: How is the POEMS syndrome treated?

A: Treatment for the POEMS syndrome is guided by findings from observational studies in the absence of data from randomized, controlled trials. For patients who have plasmacytoma (or plasmacytomas) without bone marrow involvement, radiation therapy to affected sites alone may be curative. However, patients with clonal plasma cells on bone marrow biopsy require treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Patients treated with glucocorticoids in conjunction with an extended course of melphalan have had symptomatic benefit (with improvement initially in fluid overload and later in neuropathy) and reduced mortality, as compared with patients treated with either glucocorticoids alone or limited courses of alkylator-based chemotherapy. Case series of patients treated with high-dose melphalan conditioning followed by autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation have had long-lasting and clinically significant improvements in symptoms and hematologic and radiologic findings and have had normalization of plasma VEGF levels, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 94%. Case series or reports have also suggested favorable outcomes with the use of thalidomide, lenalidomide, or bortezomib-based therapies in patients who are too ill to undergo stem-cell transplantation or who have disease that is refractory to other therapies.

Disorders of Plasma Sodium

Posted by Carla Rothaus • January 2nd, 2015

The latest review in the Disorders of Fluids and Electrolytes series considers the causes and consequences of an abnormal plasma sodium concentration and offers a framework for correcting it.

Human cells dwell in salt water. Their well-being depends on the ability of the body to regulate the salinity of extracellular fluids. By controlling water intake and excretion, the osmoregulatory system normally prevents the plasma sodium concentration from straying outside its normal range (135 to 142 mmol per liter). Failure of the system to regulate within this range exposes cells to hypotonic or hypertonic stress.

Clinical Pearls

What factors determine plasma sodium concentration, and how does plasma sodium concentration affect cell volume?

Solute concentrations (osmolalities) must be equal inside and outside of cells because water channels (aquaporins) make cell membranes permeable to water. Although sodium is largely extracellular and potassium is intracellular, body fluids can be considered as being in a single “tub” containing sodium, potassium, and water, because osmotic gradients are quickly abolished by water movement across cell membranes. As such, the concentration of sodium in plasma water should equal the concentration of sodium plus potassium in total body water.

Plasma [Na+] = total body (Na+ + K+)/total body H20.

This concentration is altered by net external balances (intake minus output) of sodium, potassium, and water and by internal exchange between sodium that is free in solution and sodium that is bound to polyanionic proteoglycans in bone, cartilage, skin, and connective tissue. The term “tonicity” describes the effect of plasma on cells — hypotonicity makes cells swell and hypertonicity makes them shrink. Hypernatremia always indicates hypertonicity. Hyponatremia usually indicates hypotonicity, but there are exceptions.

Figure 1. Internal and External Solute and Water Balance and the Plasma Sodium Concentration.

What determines the tonicity of urine, and is urinary sodium excretion linked to plasma sodium concentration?

The electrolyte concentration (sodium plus potassium) of urine, and not its osmolality (which includes electrolytes, urea, and glucose), determines its effect on the plasma sodium concentration. Urine is hypotonic if its electrolyte concentration is lower than that of plasma; because it is partly composed of electrolyte-free water, it will increase plasma sodium concentrations. Conversely, urine is hypertonic if its electrolyte concentration is higher than that of plasma; its excretion will lower plasma sodium concentrations. Urinary excretion of sodium is relatively independent of plasma sodium levels. Excretion of sodium responds to intravascular volume, increasing with volume expansion and decreasing with volume depletion.

Morning Report Questions

Q: What are general guidelines for the management of hyponatremia?

A: Hyponatremia is usually a chronic condition; to reduce symptoms and improve potential outcomes, it should be corrected gradually with the use of fluid restriction, salt tablets, slow infusions of 3% saline, furosemide, urea, or vasopressin antagonists, or by treatment of the underlying cause. Even when symptoms are severe, chronic hyponatremia need not be corrected by increasing the plasma sodium concentration by more than 4 to 6 mmol per liter per day. Regardless of how chronic hyponatremia is treated, inadvertent overcorrection, most commonly caused by excretion of dilute urine, is common and can be very dangerous. If the plasma sodium concentration is less than 120 mmol per liter, or if there are risk factors for osmotic demyelination, correction of the plasma sodium concentration by more than 8 mmol per liter per day should be meticulously avoided through replacement of lost water or prevention of water loss with desmopressin, a synthetic vasopressin.

Table 1. Treatment and Limits of Correction of Severe Hyponatremia.

Table 2. Treatment and Limits of Correction of Severe Hypernatremia.

Q: What are the consequences of rapid changes in plasma sodium concentration?

A: Although osmotic disturbances affect all cells, clinical manifestations of hyponatremia and hypernatremia are primarily neurologic, and rapid changes in plasma sodium concentrations in either direction can cause severe, permanent, and sometimes lethal brain injury. If severe hypernatremia develops over a period of minutes (e.g., after massive ingestion of salt that may occur in a suicide attempt), vascular injury created by a suddenly shrinking brain causes intracranial hemorrhage. Brain swelling from an abrupt onset of hyponatremia results in increased intracranial pressure, impairing cerebral blood flow and sometimes causing herniation. Brain injury after rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia manifests as a biphasic illness called the osmotic demyelination syndrome: an initial reduction in symptoms is followed by a gradual onset of new neurologic findings. The clinical spectrum of the osmotic demyelination syndrome is broad and can include seizures, behavioral abnormalities, and movement disorders. The most severely affected patients become “locked in,” unable to move, speak, or swallow because of demyelination of the central pons. Acute hypernatremia may also cause brain demyelination, without the biphasic clinical course of the osmotic demyelination syndrome.

Figure 3. Consequences of Rapid Changes in the Plasma Sodium Concentration.

Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Posted by Chana Sacks • December 31st, 2014

She knew the signs.

When Mary suddenly dropped her coffee cup because all of the strength in her right arm disappeared and her speech became garbled, she knew that she was having a stroke.  A wise 78-year-old, Mary couldn’t remember where she had learned these warning signs – was it from from her doctor? A friend? Something on TV? – but she realized that she had to get to a hospital.  Her husband called 9-1-1, and she was transported to the Emergency Department.

Suspecting that Mary was correct in the diagnosis, the Emergency Department physician urgently paged the neurology team, while rushing her into the CT scanner. A non-contrast head CT showed no intracranial bleed, and less than 90minutes after the onset of her first symptom, thrombolytics were pushed through the IV in her arm.  A CT angiogram ultimately confirmed that an occlusion in the middle cerebral artery was indeed the culprit.  While the care Mary had received up to this point had been efficient and consistent with the latest evidence, the question remained: could anything else be done to improve her chance of a good functional outcome?

This was precisely the question that the MR CLEAN investigators posed in a new trial of intraarterial treatment, now published in NEJM.   Prior to this study, intravenous alteplase administered within 4.5 hours of stroke onset was the only proven effective reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic strokes. The MR CLEAN researchers sought to examine whether intraarterial treatment – defined as intraarterial thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both – improved outcomes. The data from this trial offer reasons to believe that we may be entering a new era in the treatment of acute ischemic strokes.

This phase 3 trial included 500 adults from 16 centers in the Netherlands who were randomized to either usual care plus intraarterial treatment or usual care alone.  All participants had an acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal occlusion of the anterior cerebral circulation demonstrated on vessel imaging, had a score of 2 or greater on the NIH Stroke Scale, and could undergo intraarterial treatment within 6 hours of stroke onset.   Importantly, usual care could include the use of intravenous thrombolytics, and 89% of patients received IV alteplase prior to randomization.   The mean age of participants in the trial was 65 years.  There was no upper age limit, and in fact, the oldest patient in the study was 96.

The data show a significant improvement in functional outcomes for participants in the intraarterial treatment arm: at 90 days, 32.6% of participants in the intervention arm were functionally independent (with a score of 2 points or less on the modified Rankin that measures functional outcomes) as compared with 19.1% in the usual care arm [absolute difference 13.5 percentage points, 95% CI 5.9 to 21.2].  No significant difference was observed in the rates of mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.  However, at 90 days, 13 of 233 patients (5.6%) in the intraarterial treatment group had signs of a new ischemic stroke in a different vascular territory, as compared with only 1 of 267 patients (0.4%) in the control arm.

In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Werner Hacke poses the critical question.  He asks, “Is there any doubt left, or should thrombectomy now become the new standard treatment for severe stroke with proximal large-vessel occlusion up to 6 hours after stroke onset?” In the end, he seems cautiously optimistic but suggests that further data will be critical. Putting it all in context, he calls this trial, “the first step in the right direction.”

Back to Mary – as intraarterial treatment is not currently the standard of care, it seems likely that the hospital where she presented will hope that IV thrombolysis is enough to restore her highly functional baseline.  However, if further trials that are already underway confirm the results found here, we may soon be able to do more to stave off the potentially devastating effects of large ischemic strokes.

For more on MR CLEAN, view the Quick Take video summary.

Esophageal Carcinoma

Posted by Carla Rothaus • December 26th, 2014

The 5-year survival rate in esophageal cancer, although poor, has improved over the past decade. A new review discusses the epidemiologic aspects, pathogenesis, prevention, and therapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma, focusing on recent advances.

In spite of the fact that the ability to detect early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma has improved, most tumors are found when regional metastasis (in 30% of cases) or distant metastasis (in 40% of cases) has already occurred, at which point the 5-year survival rate declines from 39% in cases of localized disease to 4% in cases with distant metastasis.

Clinical Pearls

Describe the epidemiology of esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer has two main subtypes — esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma; their precursor lesions are esophageal squamous dysplasia and Barrett’s esophagus, respectively. Although squamous-cell carcinoma accounts for about 90% of cases of esophageal cancer worldwide, the incidence of and mortality rates associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma are rising and have surpassed those of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in several regions in North America and Europe. In the United States, more than 18,000 new cases of esophageal cancer and more than 15,000 deaths from esophageal cancer were expected in 2014. Esophageal carcinoma is rare in young people and increases in incidence with age, peaking in the seventh and eighth decades of life. The main risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma are gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, and cigarette smoking; H. pylori infection is associated with a reduced risk. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption constitute the main risk factors for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. High intake of red meats, fats, and processed foods is associated with an increased risk of both types of esophageal cancer, whereas high intake of fiber, fresh fruit, and vegetables is associated with a lower risk.

How do esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma differ?

Esophageal adenocarcinoma has become the predominant type of esophageal cancer in North America and Europe, while esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma remains the predominant esophageal cancer in Asia, Africa, and South America and among African Americans in North America. Adenocarcinoma is three to four times as common in men as it is in women, whereas the sex distribution is more equal for squamous-cell carcinoma. The endoscopic appearance is also similar, although approximately three quarters of all adenocarcinoma lesions are found in the distal esophagus, whereas squamous-cell carcinoma is more frequent in the proximal to middle esophagus. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States is approximately 17%, which is slightly higher than the rate for patients with squamous-cell carcinoma.

Morning Report Questions

Q: What is the typical presentation of a patient with esophageal carcinoma?

A: The clinical presentation is similar between esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma, despite differences in demographic and risk factors. Common clinical presentations include progressive dysphagia, weight loss, and heartburn unresponsive to medical treatment, as well as signs of blood loss. Less common symptoms include hoarseness, cough, and pneumonia related to laryngeal nerve paralysis or invasion of the tracheobronchial tree.

Q: How is adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated?

A: The introduction of endoscopic mucosal resection with or without ablation has been a major advance in treating not only Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia but also adenocarcinoma that is limited to the epithelial portion of the mucosa (category T1a), particularly for small tumors (<2 cm in diameter) that are asymptomatic and noncircumferential. In patients with category T1b tumors that have penetrated the muscularis mucosae and entered the submucosa, the risk of lymph-node spread is as high as 20%, and radical esophagectomy may be the preferred method of treatment, although some treatment centers have expanded the indications for endoscopic therapy to include low-risk submucosal tumors. Locally advanced tumors, defined as category T3N1, are best treated with esophagectomy. The main advance in treating patients who undergo esophagectomy has been the adoption of neoadjuvant treatment.       Randomized, controlled trials have shown a survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy, as compared with esophagectomy alone, in both types of esophageal carcinoma. Obstructive symptoms related to unresectable disease can be palliated with endoscopic esophageal stenting or high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy.

Figure 2. Simplified Staging of Esophageal Carcinoma.

Table 1. Management of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.