{"id":13373,"date":"2011-11-13T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-13T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/?post_type=news&#038;p=13373"},"modified":"2011-11-13T08:29:39","modified_gmt":"2011-11-13T13:29:39","slug":"tracer-novel-anticoagulant-vorapaxar-runs-into-trouble-in-acs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/2011\/11\/13\/tracer-novel-anticoagulant-vorapaxar-runs-into-trouble-in-acs\/","title":{"rendered":"TRACER: Novel Antiplatelet Vorapaxar Runs Into Trouble in ACS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The novel antiplatelet vorapaxar, which\u00a0blocks the thrombin receptor to inhibit platelet activation, ran into trouble in the\u00a0TRACER (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial, which was stopped prematurely earlier this year due to safety concerns.<\/p>\n<p>TRACER was\u00a0presented at the AHA by Ken Mahaffey and <a title=\"TRACER\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1109719\" target=\"_blank\">published simultaneously in the\u00a0<\/a><em><a title=\"TRACER\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1109719\" target=\"_blank\">New England Journal of Medicine<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The trial\u00a0randomized 12,944 patients with ACS, most of whom were receiving antiplatelet therapy. After enrollment in the trial was complete, the follow-up was terminated early due to an increase in major bleeding, including intracerebral hemorrhage. (A companion trial, the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT00526474?term=SCH+530348&amp;rank=4\">TRA-2P TIMI 50<\/a>\u00a0trial testing vorapaxar for secondary prevention, was not halted, \u00a0butt vorapaxar was discontinued in patients with a history of stroke.)<\/p>\n<p>After a median follow-up of 502 days, the primary endpoint,\u00a0a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization, occurred in 18.5% of patients in the vorapaxar group versus 19.9% in the placebo group (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.01; <em>P<\/em>=0.07). The investigators reported\u00a0a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke, from 16.4% in the placebo group to 14.7% in the vorapaxar group (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98; <em>P<\/em>=0.02).<\/p>\n<p>However, moderate and severe bleeding occurred in 7.2% of the vorapaxar group and 5.2% of the placebo group (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.58; <em>P<\/em>&lt;0.001).\u00a0Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1.1% of the vorapaxar group versus 0.2% of the placebo group (HR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78-6.45; <em>P<\/em>&lt;0.001).<\/p>\n<p>The investigators remained hopeful that future research might &#8220;lead to a better understanding of whether different strategies&#8221; of thrombin receptor blockade might be beneficial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The novel antiplatelet vorapaxar, which\u00a0blocks the thrombin receptor to inhibit platelet activation, ran into trouble in the\u00a0TRACER (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial, which was stopped prematurely earlier this year due to safety concerns. TRACER was\u00a0presented at the AHA by Ken Mahaffey and published simultaneously in the\u00a0New England Journal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":196,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[495],"tags":[239,668,655],"class_list":["post-13373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anticoagulation-2","tag-acs","tag-thrombin-receptor-antagonist","tag-vorapaxar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/196"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}