{"id":1359,"date":"2009-11-18T12:21:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-18T17:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/at-the-aha-cardiovascular-outcomes-similar-between-aggressive-and-restrictive-post-operative-transfusion-strategies\/"},"modified":"2011-07-19T17:45:07","modified_gmt":"2011-07-19T21:45:07","slug":"at-the-aha-cardiovascular-outcomes-similar-between-aggressive-and-restrictive-post-operative-transfusion-strategies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/2009\/11\/18\/at-the-aha-cardiovascular-outcomes-similar-between-aggressive-and-restrictive-post-operative-transfusion-strategies\/","title":{"rendered":"At the AHA: Cardiovascular Outcomes Similar Between Aggressive and Restrictive Post-Operative Transfusion Strategies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The FOCUS trial randomized 2,016 patients (mean age 82 years) with high cardiovascular risk undergoing hip fracture surgery to either an aggressive or restrictive post-operative transfusion strategy.\u00a0 Transfusions were administered to maintain a hemoglobin above 10 g\/dL in the aggressive arm and 8 g\/dL in the restrictive arm.\u00a0 In the restrictive arm, transfusions were also permitted to treat active signs or symptoms of anemia.\u00a0 Investigators reported at the AHA Scientific Sessions that there was no significant difference between\u00a0either strategy\u00a0in cardiovascular outcomes during the index hospitalization.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The FOCUS trial randomized 2,016 patients (mean age 82 years) with high cardiovascular risk undergoing hip fracture surgery to either an aggressive or restrictive post-operative transfusion strategy.\u00a0 Transfusions were administered to maintain a hemoglobin above 10 g\/dL in the aggressive arm and 8 g\/dL in the restrictive arm.\u00a0 In the restrictive arm, transfusions were also [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":196,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/196"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1359"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1359\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}