{"id":1549,"date":"2010-06-03T14:58:15","date_gmt":"2010-06-03T18:58:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/%e2%80%a2canoe-paddles-into-the-avandia-storm%e2%80%a2-ticagrelor-nda-scheduled-for-july-fda-panel\/"},"modified":"2011-07-19T17:44:57","modified_gmt":"2011-07-19T21:44:57","slug":"%e2%80%a2canoe-paddles-into-the-avandia-storm%e2%80%a2-ticagrelor-nda-scheduled-for-july-fda-panel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/2010\/06\/03\/%e2%80%a2canoe-paddles-into-the-avandia-storm%e2%80%a2-ticagrelor-nda-scheduled-for-july-fda-panel\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2022\u00a0CANOE Paddles Into the Avandia Storm<br \/>\u2022 Ticagrelor NDA Scheduled for July FDA Panel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>CANOE Paddles Into the Avandia Storm: <\/strong>Rosiglitazone is effective in preventing progression to diabetes, but very public concerns have been raised about its cardiovascular safety. Investigators in Canada sought to assess the efficacy of a low-dose regimen, in the hopes that adverse effects would be reduced.&nbsp;The CANOE (CAnadian Normoglycemia Outcomes Evaluation) trial&nbsp;randomized 207 patients with impaired glucose tolerance to low-dose combination therapy with rosiglitazone and metformin or matching placebo. After 3.9 years, diabetes occurred in 39% of the control group compared with 14% of the combination-therapy group (P&lt;0.0001). In addition, more patients in the treatment group achieved normal glucose tolerance: 80% versus 53% in the placebo group (P=0.0002).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These results lend support to the notion of use of low-dose combination therapies as an effective means to manage complex metabolic disorders,&#8221; the investigators write in their <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/article\/PIIS0140-6736(10)60746-5\/fulltext\">online report in the <em>Lancet<\/em>.<\/a> But they acknowledge that the trial &#8220;was not designed nor powered to establish long-term effects on cardiovascular safety. CANOE cannot provide additional definitive data for the controversy relating to the specific cardiovascular safety of rosiglitazone.&#8221; In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/article\/PIIS0140-6736(10)60900-2\/fulltext\">an accompanying comment<\/a>, Thomas Buchanan and Anny Xiang write that &#8220;the larger issues that have cast doubt on use of drugs to prevent diabetes are not addressed by the CANOE trial&#8221; and that successful prevention of diabetes will require treatments that halt the deterioration of \u03b2-cell function.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ticagrelor NDA Scheduled for July FDA Panel:<\/strong> The FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee will meet on July 28 to&nbsp;consider the new drug application for ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca) &#8220;for the&nbsp;proposed indication for use in acute coronary syndrome (including heart attacks and any of a group of signs and symptoms, such as chest pain or shortness of breath, that are consistent with blockages in the blood vessels that supply the heart).&#8221; (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fda.gov\/AdvisoryCommittees\/Calendar\/ucm214252.htm\">FDA Meeting Announcement<\/a>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CANOE Paddles Into the Avandia Storm: Rosiglitazone is effective in preventing progression to diabetes, but very public concerns have been raised about its cardiovascular safety. Investigators in Canada sought to assess the efficacy of a low-dose regimen, in the hopes that adverse effects would be reduced.&nbsp;The CANOE (CAnadian Normoglycemia Outcomes Evaluation) trial&nbsp;randomized 207 patients with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":196,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/196"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}