{"id":31476,"date":"2012-08-29T16:42:22","date_gmt":"2012-08-29T20:42:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/?post_type=news&#038;p=31476"},"modified":"2012-08-29T16:42:22","modified_gmt":"2012-08-29T20:42:22","slug":"pilot-study-demonstrates-feasibility-of-mri-guided-catheterization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/2012\/08\/29\/pilot-study-demonstrates-feasibility-of-mri-guided-catheterization\/","title":{"rendered":"Pilot Study Demonstrates Feasibility of MRI-Guided Catheterization"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A small pilot study has demonstrated that it may one day be possible to replace x-rays with MRI to guide some cardiac catheterization procedures.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org\/content\/early\/2012\/08\/01\/eurheartj.ehs189.abstract?sid=21b771fe-07c8-45ab-a90c-cf8c31f7b6d9\">As reported in the <em>European Heart Journal<\/em>,<\/a>\u00a0researchers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute (NHLBI) performed x-ray and MRI-guided transfemoral right heart catheterization in 16 patients (4 with shunt, 9 with coronary artery disease, 3 with other indications). Each patient first underwent catheterization under x-ray guidance, which was then repeated twice with MRI, once using an air-filled balloon-tipped catheter and once using a gadolinium-filled balloon-tipped catheter.<\/p>\n<p>In all but one patient, complete guidewire-free catheterization was successful with both techniques. The\u00a0researchers said that MRI using gadolinium-filled balloons was &#8220;at least as successful as x-ray in all procedure steps, more successful than MRI using air-filled balloons, and better than both in entering the left pulmonary artery.&#8221; Procedure time was not significantly longer with MRI. &#8220;Catheter conspicuity was best under x-ray and next-best using gadolinium-filled MRI balloons,&#8221; the researchers reported.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis could be the first chapter of a big story,\u201d said Robert S. Balaban, scientific director of the NHLBI&#8217;s Division of Intramural Research, in an NHLBI press release. &#8220;It provides evidence that clinical heart catheter procedures are possible without using radiation, which could be especially valuable in areas such as pediatrics.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The authors acknowledge an important limitation of their research: &#8220;We do not believe coronary artery interventional procedures are a realistic possibility because of inadequate spatial and temporal resolution. However, we do believe structural heart interventions to be realistic therapeutic targets, including delivery and repair of cardiac valve devices, non-surgical access and closure of large transthoracic cardiac access ports, repair of other cardiac structural defects, and enhanced image guidance of peripheral artery\u00a0interventions such as recanalization of chronic occlusion.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A small pilot study has demonstrated that it may one day be possible to replace x-rays with MRI to guide some cardiac catheterization procedures. As reported in the European Heart Journal,\u00a0researchers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute (NHLBI) performed x-ray and MRI-guided transfemoral right heart catheterization in 16 patients (4 with shunt, 9 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":196,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,9],"tags":[1434,741,846,1435],"class_list":["post-31476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cardiac-imaging","category-interventional-cardiology","tag-cardiac-catheterization","tag-mri","tag-radiation","tag-x-rays"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/196"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31476"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31476\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}