{"id":45484,"date":"2014-10-07T10:59:11","date_gmt":"2014-10-07T14:59:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/?post_type=voices&#038;p=45484"},"modified":"2014-10-07T10:59:11","modified_gmt":"2014-10-07T14:59:11","slug":"another-reason-for-open-access-to-clinical-trial-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/2014\/10\/07\/another-reason-for-open-access-to-clinical-trial-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Reason for Open Access to Clinical Trial Data?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa0905561\">Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial<\/a> the investigators miscounted their endpoints and, last week, published a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMc1407908\">corrected version in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The discrepancies came to light, in part, because of litigation. The final results do not shift the interpretation of the trial, but should we be bothered that there was a need to correct this in response to litigation? Is this another reason to have data out in the open for others to review?<\/p>\n<p><strong>What is your reaction to this correction?<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A correction to the RE-LY trial results, partly brought to light because of litigation, has Harlan Krumholz wondering if this is another example of why we should have open access to clinical trial data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":211,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[495,1],"tags":[2390,339,2372,2152,340,368],"class_list":["post-45484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anticoagulation-2","category-general","tag-correction","tag-dabigatran","tag-open-access","tag-open-data","tag-re-ly","tag-warfarin"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/211"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45484"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45484\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/cardioexchange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}