{"id":129,"date":"2008-11-02T06:38:11","date_gmt":"2008-11-02T11:38:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/?p=129"},"modified":"2015-06-04T15:31:40","modified_gmt":"2015-06-04T19:31:40","slug":"the-big-hiv-news-from-icaacidsa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/the-big-hiv-news-from-icaacidsa\/2008\/11\/02\/","title":{"rendered":"The Big HIV News from ICAAC\/IDSA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2008\/11\/cornucopia1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-130\" title=\"cornucopia\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2008\/11\/cornucopia1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"206\" \/><\/a>Tons of interesting stuff at this year&#8217;s combined <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icaacidsa2008.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">ICAAC\/IDSA meeting,<\/a> most of it in non-HIV related Infectious Diseases. \u00a0In aggregate, literally hundreds of posters, presentations, and symposia on MRSA, C diff, osteomyelitis, complicated UTIs, hospital-acquired pneumonia, antibiotic resistance &#8230; It&#8217;s a great meeting to catch up on general ID, and the literature review sessions alone are practically worth the price of admission.<\/p>\n<p>But there are almost always a few major HIV-related studies presented as well, and this year was no exception. \u00a0These two understandably got the most attention:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Early antiretroviral therapy increases survival [Kitahata H-896b]. \u00a0<\/strong>The NA-ACCORD study compared all-cause mortality among more than 8,000 patients with HIV followed since 1996.\u00a0 Compared with those starting therapy with a CD4 cell count between 200 and 350, patients starting with CD4s between 350 and 500 had a <em>70% reduction in the risk of death. <\/em>\u00a0Wow. \u00a0[Addendum:\u00a0 Our astute editor at AIDS Clinical Care points out that this is really a 43% reduction, as the relative hazard for mortality for the group deferring is 1.7.\u00a0 Still wow.]\u00a0 Usual caveats on the limitations of cohort studies apply, but this was a very well done study with a huge sample size; its conclusions were further bolstered by the observation that virologic suppression rates did not differ between the two groups &#8212; implying comparable levels of medication adherence. \u00a0Stay tuned for a similar analysis of those starting with a CD4 &gt; 500 cells &#8212; whispers that we&#8217;ll see this info at next year&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.retroconference.org\/2009\/\" target=\"_blank\">CROI in Montreal<\/a>. \u00a0\u00a0Will this be the final word on the &#8220;when to start treatment&#8221; question we&#8217;ve been debating now <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/1969114?ordinalpos=4&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum\" target=\"_blank\">for two decades<\/a>? \u00a0Should pretty much <em>every <\/em>patients with HIV be on therapy? \u00a0What will happen to the planned &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cphiv.dk\/portals\/0\/files\/INSIGHT_july_2007.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">START<\/a>&#8221; randomized trial?\u00a0\u00a0I sense unless something truly unanticipated happens with drug toxicity, we&#8217;re going to be starting a lot of asymptomatic patients on treatment over the next few years.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Raltegravir vs efavirenz as initial therapy [Lennox H-896a].<\/strong> \u00a0Can something be as good as efavirenz (essentially our current gold standard) \u00a0for initial therapy? \u00a0Apparently yes &#8212; raltegravir was &#8220;non-inferior*&#8221; to efavirenz when combined with TDF\/FTC in a large phase III, double-blind study:\u00a0\u00a0Virologic suppression rates at 48 weeks were 86% for RAL compared to 82% for EFV.\u00a0 There were also lower rates of drug-related averse events in the raltegravir arm, with protocol-specified CNS toxicity occurring in 18% of efavirenz and 10% of\u00a0raltegravir-treated subjects. \u00a0We&#8217;ve been using the 2NRTI + NNRTI or PI \u00a0approach as initial therapy for a long time &#8212; here at last is a new approach.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>And for the record, I&#8217;m a big fan of this combined ICAAC\/IDSA meeting, but it will be separate for at least\u00a0the next two years at least. \u00a0Oh well.<\/p>\n<p><em>*The use of the term &#8220;non-inferior&#8221; always sounds like pedantic statistics-ese to me.\u00a0 86% &#8220;non-inferior&#8221; to 82%?\u00a0 But it does mean something specific &#8212; best described to me as &#8220;not too much worse than&#8221;, with &#8220;too much worse&#8221; generally defined as within\u00a010-12%.\u00a0 But the lower-limit of the 95% confidence interval can&#8217;t be below this 10-12%, and that&#8217;s where peculiar statements such as &#8220;86% is noninferior to 82%&#8221; come from.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tons of interesting stuff at this year&#8217;s combined ICAAC\/IDSA meeting, most of it in non-HIV related Infectious Diseases. \u00a0In aggregate, literally hundreds of posters, presentations, and symposia on MRSA, C diff, osteomyelitis, complicated UTIs, hospital-acquired pneumonia, antibiotic resistance &#8230; It&#8217;s a great meeting to catch up on general ID, and the literature review sessions alone [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,5,6],"tags":[77,83,162,244,399,423,478,485,779,805],"class_list":["post-129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care","category-hiv","category-infectious-diseases","category-medical-education","tag-antiretroviral-therapy","tag-art","tag-cd4","tag-croi","tag-haart","tag-hiv","tag-icaac","tag-idsa","tag-raltegravir","tag-retrovirus-conference"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}