{"id":1984,"date":"2011-10-03T22:52:45","date_gmt":"2011-10-04T02:52:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/?p=1984"},"modified":"2015-06-04T15:15:43","modified_gmt":"2015-06-04T19:15:43","slug":"cascade-when-to-start-yet-another-take","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/cascade-when-to-start-yet-another-take\/2011\/10\/03\/","title":{"rendered":"CASCADE:  When to Start, (Yet) Another Take"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2011\/10\/cascade1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-1989\" title=\"cascade\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2011\/10\/cascade1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"288\" height=\"198\" \/><\/a>As we await the enrollment, analysis, and results of the START study &#8212; which is randomizing patients with CD4&gt;500 to start HIV therapy \u00a0vs waiting until the CD4 falls to 350 &#8212; much of the research on &#8220;when to start&#8221; ART in patients with high CD4&#8217;s comes from observational studies. Several have already been published (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa0807252\" target=\"_blank\">NA-ACCORD<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2670965\/?tool=pubmed\" target=\"_blank\">ART-CC<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.annals.org\/content\/154\/8\/509.long\" target=\"_blank\">CAUSAL<\/a>), but one limitation of each of them is that none could accurately assess duration of HIV infection.<\/p>\n<p>Enter &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/archinte.ama-assn.org\/cgi\/content\/short\/171\/17\/1560\" target=\"_blank\">CASCADE<\/a>&#8220;, or &#8220;Concerted Action on SeroConversion to AIDS and Death in Europe&#8221;. CASCADE includes patients from Europe, Australia, and Canada only if they have a defined date of HIV acquisition, thereby limiting effects of lead-time bias. In order to get at the when-to-start question, the investigators constructed something called &#8220;nested subcohorts&#8221; between 1996 and 2009, comparing the outcomes of those who started ART vs. those who didn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>The results? Out of 9,455 patients, starting ART (vs deferring) was associated with a lower risk of developing AIDS or death for those with a CD4 cell count &lt; 500 &#8212; but not for those who started between 500-799. An interesting aspect of this study is that they were able to calculate a &#8220;number needed to treat&#8221; (NNT) to prevent progression. Over 3 years of follow-up, 21 and 34 patients would need to start treatment to prevent one patient from progressing to AIDS or death in those with CD4s between 200-349 and 350-499 respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Usual caveats of observational studies apply &#8212; most notably that no such study can control for all factors between those who started ART vs those who didn&#8217;t that would influence outcome &#8212; but the results are helpful nonetheless, as the benefits of therapy <em>before<\/em> the CD4 cell count falls to &lt; 350 shown here have been consistently seen in multiple studies. Furthermore, the NNT data to prevent AIDS or death &#8212; 34 for CD4 between 350-499 &#8212; place the benefits of treating these patients as even greater than what we accomplish with <a href=\"http:\/\/circoutcomes.ahajournals.org\/content\/2\/6\/616.long\" target=\"_blank\">statin therapy for hypercholesterolemia to prevent MIs<\/a>, which is estimated as 40-70.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line: \u00a0Treating patients with CD4 350-500 and no symptoms may not be as exciting giving ART to someone with advanced HIV disease, but it sure makes good clinical sense.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As we await the enrollment, analysis, and results of the START study &#8212; which is randomizing patients with CD4&gt;500 to start HIV therapy \u00a0vs waiting until the CD4 falls to 350 &#8212; much of the research on &#8220;when to start&#8221; ART in patients with high CD4&#8217;s comes from observational studies. Several have already been published [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,8,10],"tags":[77,83,423,992],"class_list":["post-1984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care","category-hiv","category-patient-care","category-research","tag-antiretroviral-therapy","tag-art","tag-hiv","tag-when-to-start"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1984\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}