{"id":3650,"date":"2013-01-17T15:18:59","date_gmt":"2013-01-17T20:18:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/?p=3650"},"modified":"2015-06-04T15:13:28","modified_gmt":"2015-06-04T19:13:28","slug":"why-the-results-of-the-c-diff-study-you-know-which-one-were-no-surprise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/why-the-results-of-the-c-diff-study-you-know-which-one-were-no-surprise\/2013\/01\/17\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the Results of the C Diff Study (You Know Which One) Were No Surprise"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In cased you missed it, fecal transplant &#8212; use of poop from a healthy donor, which is then infused into the colon either from above (nasogastric tube) or below (colonoscope) &#8212; is unquestionably the most effective treatment for people who have multiple recurrences of <em>C. difficile<\/em> colitis (C diff).<\/p>\n<p>We know this because of a randomized study <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1205037?query=featured_home\" target=\"_blank\">just published\u00a0in the\u00a0<\/a><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1205037?query=featured_home\" target=\"_blank\">New England Journal of Medicine<\/a>. <\/em>Here&#8217;s the punch line:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>The study was stopped after an interim analysis.<\/strong><em>\u00a0<\/em>Of 16 patients in the infusion group, 13 (81%) had resolution of\u00a0<em>C. difficile<\/em>\u2013associated diarrhea after the first infusion. The 3 remaining patients received a second infusion with feces from a different donor, with resolution in 2 patients. Resolution of\u00a0<em>C. difficile<\/em>\u00a0infection occurred in 4 of 13 patients (31%) receiving vancomycin alone and in 3 of 13 patients (23%) receiving vancomycin with bowel lavage (P&lt;0.001 for both comparisons with the infusion group).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A slam dunk win for fecal transplant, so much so that there was no point even completing the study.\u00a0In the <em>New York Times<\/em> right now, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/01\/17\/health\/disgusting-maybe-but-treatment-works-study-finds.html?src=me&amp;ref=general\" target=\"_blank\">coverage of the paper<\/a> is actually their most e-mailed story, and even the non-clinicians in our office are buzzing about it.<\/p>\n<p>(Inevitably with giggles and jokes. This stuff is hard for people to talk about, but they somehow can&#8217;t resist.)<\/p>\n<p>But many of us in the ID world knew that fecal transplant was going to work great for C diff even before this study. How did we know?<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>The current treatment for recurrent C diff is terrible.<\/strong> Metronidazole, vancomycin, and fidaxomicin all share a basic problem. They are antibiotics. And antibiotics cause C diff to begin with. Fail.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Probiotics don&#8217;t do much.<\/strong> As much as I&#8217;d wish to say otherwise, the efficacy data for probiotics in preventing C diff relapse are marginal at best. Remember, lots of what makes up &#8220;normal&#8221; flora can&#8217;t even be cultured &#8212; so how do you put those bugs in a capsule? Looks like we need to use the real thing to get those normal bacteria back.<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-3651\" title=\"C Diff Cliff\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2013\/01\/C-Diff-Cliff.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"323\" height=\"242\" \/><\/li>\n<li><strong>The published uncontrolled studies on use of fecal transplant were extraordinarily\u00a0favorable.<\/strong> In <a href=\"http:\/\/cid.oxfordjournals.org\/content\/53\/10\/994.abstract\" target=\"_blank\">this systematic review<\/a>, the cure rate <em>was 92%.<\/em> And remember, the people referred for these procedures were horribly weakened by recurrent C diff, and many had severe\u00a0underlying medical conditions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Our limited anecdotal experience confirmed that this actually works.<\/strong> One of the local gastroenterologists has been doing this for a couple of years. Our first referral was an 84-year-old man with two forms of cancer, diabetes, and 5 episodes of recurrent C diff, bad enough that he&#8217;d lost more than 15% of his baseline weight. One fecal transplant procedure &#8212; C diff gone.<\/li>\n<li><strong>For patients and doctors to keep doing something this disgusting, it must be effective.<\/strong> There&#8217;s a reason we snicker and jest when discussing fecal transplants &#8212; it&#8217;s gross and makes us uncomfortable. Just look at all the various euphemisms out there for this procedure &#8212;\u00a0intestinal microbiota transplantation, fecal biotherapy, bacteriotherapy, human probiotic infusion. (That last one is my personal favorite &#8212; you can even call it &#8220;HPI.&#8221;) Anything to get rid of that nasty image of having other people&#8217;s poop inside of us, yuck. Sorry for mentioning that.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>So consider the publication of this landmark article as a way of getting the word out to the rest of the world that this unsavory &#8212; but undoubtedly very effective &#8212; treatment is here to stay.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s just hope they can find another important job for <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/index.php\/chaos-in-the-diagnosis-of-c-diff-and-dogs-are-amazing-creatures\/2012\/12\/22\/\" target=\"_blank\">C diff Cliff.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In cased you missed it, fecal transplant &#8212; use of poop from a healthy donor, which is then infused into the colon either from above (nasogastric tube) or below (colonoscope) &#8212; is unquestionably the most effective treatment for people who have multiple recurrences of C. difficile colitis (C diff). We know this because of a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,8,10],"tags":[131,202,352],"class_list":["post-3650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-infectious-diseases","category-patient-care","category-research","tag-c-diff","tag-clostridium","tag-fecal-transplant"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}