{"id":6056,"date":"2015-05-13T15:42:29","date_gmt":"2015-05-13T19:42:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/?p=6056"},"modified":"2015-06-04T14:19:20","modified_gmt":"2015-06-04T18:19:20","slug":"who-guidelines-on-naming-diseases-are-well-meaning-sensible-but-kind-of-boring","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/who-guidelines-on-naming-diseases-are-well-meaning-sensible-but-kind-of-boring\/2015\/05\/13\/","title":{"rendered":"WHO Guidelines on Naming Diseases Are Well-Meaning, Sensible &#8212; But Kind of Boring"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/05\/gehrig-baseball-card.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-6071\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/05\/gehrig-baseball-card-244x300.jpg\" alt=\"gehrig baseball card\" width=\"244\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a>From the World Health Organization (WHO), a recommendation on how to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.who.int\/mediacentre\/news\/notes\/2015\/naming-new-diseases\/en\/\" target=\"_blank\">name a new disease<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The best practices state that a disease name should consist of generic descriptive terms, based on the symptoms that the disease causes (e.g. respiratory disease, neurologic syndrome, watery diarrhoea) and more specific descriptive terms when robust information is available on how the disease manifests, who it affects, its severity or seasonality (e.g. progressive, juvenile, severe, winter).<\/p>\n<p>Ok, I get it. If you name a disease &#8212; especially an <em>Infectious Disease<\/em>&#8212; after a person, place, or even animal, that name can bring with it all kinds of problems. Tourist travel and trade down. Animals unnecessarily killed. People stigmatized.<\/p>\n<p>We ID doctors are no stranger to this stigma by association, as all of us have faced the incredulous responses from seemingly kind strangers\u00a0when we tell them what we do for a living.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Well, someone has to do it,&#8221; they might say, as if we spend all our time\u00a0putting ourselves in harm&#8217;s way of numerous nasty contagions. Bet they never say that to an ophthalmologist or radiologist.<\/p>\n<p>So yes, there is stigma associated with infections of all sorts, and we have to be sensitive to that.<\/p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, some have already criticized\u00a0WHO that they are just practicing a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-3075230\/Swine-flu-banned-Q-upsets-pigs-s-no-joke-World-Health-Organisation-wants-ban-names-diseases-offensive-animals.html\" target=\"_blank\">particularly overzealous form of political correctness.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d go that far.<\/p>\n<p>But think of what will be lost if and when these WHO guidelines are adopted: many of the current disease names designate something meaningful about epidemiology &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/coronavirus\/mers\/\" target=\"_blank\">MERS<\/a>, for example, stands for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, which quite accurately describes a disease that for now is overwhelmingly occurring in the Middle East. MERS\u00a0may one day\u00a0pull\u00a0a West Nile Virus on us and become global. But even the West Nile Virus name, while no longer strictly correct, reminds us that the disease was first recognized in a particular region of Africa. Is that so terrible?<\/p>\n<p>Plus, the English major in me can&#8217;t help but find a good story, or even\u00a0poetry,\u00a0in many of these inappropriately named diseases or organisms. For example:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/lyme\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><em>Lyme Disease.<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0My friend Howard Heller, an expert in tick-related infections, says that Lyme was actually discovered in Old Lyme, Connecticut, and not Lyme itself &#8212; but it would have been too confusing to call it &#8220;Old Lyme Disease&#8221;, which would imply there&#8217;s also a &#8220;New Lyme Disease&#8221; out there. How fascinating! And while Lyme is a big problem\u00a0in all of New England, I don&#8217;t see the name of this disease keeping down <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.zillow.com\/lyme-ct\/\" target=\"_blank\">property values in southern Connecticut<\/a> <\/strong>one bit.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/powassan\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><em>Powassan virus.<\/em><\/strong><\/a> Let&#8217;s stay with the ticks for a moment. Named after the region in Canada where it was first described, Powassan is the latest scary thing transmitted from our\u00a0tick enemies. Here&#8217;s<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wcvb.com\/health\/harsh-northeast-winter-no-hindrance-to-hungry-ticks\/32402470\" target=\"_blank\">a little TV clip on Powassan from our local news station<\/a><\/strong>, where the interviewer energetically tries\u00a0to drum up drama despite my efforts to make it clear that severe forms of Powassan are\u00a0(fortunately) pretty rare so far. What if it were called &#8220;summer tick encephalitis (sometimes) virus beta&#8221;? Compared with Powassan &#8212; abbreviated POW! &#8212; that &#8220;generic&#8221; name sounds pretty blah, and am sure the networks would agree.<\/li>\n<li><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/listeria\/\" target=\"_blank\">Listeria monocytogenes.<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>The bacterium that medical students <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/a-mysteriosis-about-listeroisis\/2011\/11\/05\/\" target=\"_blank\">love to love<\/a><\/strong>, listeria was named in honor of the pioneer of sterile surgery, Joseph Lister. How can we take that away from him? And I&#8217;m sure you could find many ID doctors gladly donating their name in honor of some interesting virus, bacteria, fungus, or parasite. Sign me up! The closest thing I have is <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/medlineplus\/druginfo\/meds\/a610003.html\" target=\"_blank\">this diabetes drug<\/a><\/strong>. And this <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.saxenda.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">weight loss one<\/a><\/strong>. Should have been an endocrinologist, could use the royalties.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/rmsf\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><em>Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever.<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0Back to the ticks.\u00a0This one just sounds great, almost a line of pure poetry by itself &#8212; read it out loud for proof. Never mind the fact that the disease isn&#8217;t very common in the Rocky Mountains (peak incidence is in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/rmsf\/stats\/#geography\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>southeastern states<\/strong><\/a>). Still, I ask you &#8212; how could we ever call infection with <em>Rickettsia rickettsii<\/em> anything else? It also gives us ID doctors a trick question to ask people at parties, where we are highly desired guests. Specifically, &#8220;Where is a person most likely to get Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever?&#8221; [Answer: North Carolina] is the converse of &#8220;What color was George Washington&#8217;s white horse?&#8221; [Answer: White].<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/diagnosticofintestinalamebaes.weebly.com\/iodamoeba-butschilii.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><em>Iodamoeba b\u00fctschlii.<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0When he read\u00a0that <em>Haemophilus aphrophilus<\/em> had (sadly) changed its name, Joel Gallant sent\u00a0me an email: \u201cTell me it isn&#8217;t true! I love saying &#8216;<em>Haemophilus aphrophilus&#8217;<\/em>\u00a0as much saying <em>&#8216;<strong>Iodamoeba b\u00fctschlii,&#8217;<\/strong><\/em> <em>&#8216;Orientia tsutsugamushi,&#8217;<\/em> or &#8216;o&#8217;nyong&#8217;nyong fever&#8217;!&#8221; So who is our little friend with the umlaut? A non-pathogenic protozoan,\u00a0<em>Iodamoeba b\u00fctschlii<\/em> was named after German biologist\u00a0Otto Butschli by Stanislaus von Prowazek &#8212; who later had the cause of epidemic typhus named after him &#8212; <em>Rickettsia prowazekii!<\/em>\u00a0Analogous to authors who review each other\u2019s books, these biologists simply named organisms after each other, increasing their fame and fortune. You must agree it&#8217;s an impressive name\u00a0for a parasite\u00a0that doesn&#8217;t actually cause any disease.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Importantly, the WHO states that their guidelines apply to <em>future<\/em> diseases, so we won\u2019t lose any of the above gems &#8212; or St. Louis Encephalitis, or Legionnaire\u2019s Disease, or Kew Gardens Spotted Fever, or Pott\u2019s Puffy Tumor. Or Coxackievirus. Or Mad Cow.<\/p>\n<p>And somewhat grudgingly, I agree with Dr. Dr. Keiji Fukuda, assistant director general for health security at the WHO, that a boring name is better than one that stigmatizes people, diminishes trade or tourism, or leads to the unnecessary slaughter of thousands of animals. In defence of the charge that the policy is just political correctness run amuck, he gives an eloquent defence here in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2015\/05\/12\/406241828\/who-announces-new-guidelines-for-naming-human-diseases\" target=\"_blank\">this NPR interview.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>But\u00a0I disagree with him about one thing &#8212; a few minutes into the interview, he says &#8220;we now live in an era where probably very few people are going to know who Lou Gehrig is.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now <em>that<\/em> is simply untrue.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Gets me every time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the World Health Organization (WHO), a recommendation on how to name a new disease: The best practices state that a disease name should consist of generic descriptive terms, based on the symptoms that the disease causes (e.g. respiratory disease, neurologic syndrome, watery diarrhoea) and more specific descriptive terms when robust information is available on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,5,7],"tags":[1048,568,577,1051,994],"class_list":["post-6056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care","category-infectious-diseases","category-misc","tag-disease-names","tag-listeria-monocytogenes","tag-lyme-disease","tag-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever","tag-who"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6056\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}