{"id":7669,"date":"2015-09-07T12:08:56","date_gmt":"2015-09-07T16:08:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/?p=7669"},"modified":"2015-09-07T16:21:11","modified_gmt":"2015-09-07T20:21:11","slug":"two-drugs-with-high-prices-one-is-surprise-good-value-the-other-is-truly-a-rip-off","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/two-drugs-with-high-prices-one-is-surprise-good-value-the-other-is-truly-a-rip-off\/2015\/09\/07\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Drugs with High Prices &#8212; One is (Surprise!) Good Value, The Other is Truly a Rip-off"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/09\/cat.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-7675\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/09\/cat-233x300.jpg\" alt=\"cat\" width=\"233\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/09\/cat-233x300.jpg 233w, https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/09\/cat.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 233px) 100vw, 233px\" \/><\/a>By now, the fact that HCV treatment carries a high price is a fact as well known to the medical and non-medical public as 1) a million dollars doesn&#8217;t get you much in Manhattan or Bay-area real estate; 2) a Rolex is an expensive way to know what time it is; and 3) even though a Tesla\u00a0doesn&#8217;t need gas, buying one\u00a0won&#8217;t save you money.<\/p>\n<p>But you know what? Something interesting has happened since the initial sticker-shock of the $1000\/day pill and the cries of injustice from patients, the medical community, and activists. First, the price has been aggressively negotiated, and now is substantially lower &#8212; various unofficial estimates suggest the actual cost\u00a0is around <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/pharmalot\/2015\/02\/04\/what-the-shocking-gilead-discounts-on-its-hepatitis-c-drugs-will-mean\/\" target=\"_blank\">50% of the wholesale acquisition cost.<\/a>\u00a0Still high, yes, but <em>much<\/em> less than the dizzying cost of HCV treatment during the\u00a0&#8220;SIM-SOF&#8221; days in early 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Second, a careful analysis of this miraculous therapy shows it&#8217;s actually decent value. In other words, you pay a lot, but you get a lot too &#8212; this is what the cost-effectiveness literature shows (several citations in bullet number two at <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/melting-snow-id-link-o-rama\/2015\/04\/03\/\" target=\"_blank\">this link<\/a>), and the public is starting to take notice. An <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/09\/02\/opinion\/costly-hepatitis-c-drugs-for-everyone.html\" target=\"_blank\">editorial last\u00a0week in the <em>Times<\/em><\/a>\u00a0got it right (though it could have used a bit of quick medical editing, which I&#8217;ve provided):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The benefits of these new drugs are undeniable. They can essentially cure [not <em>essentially <\/em>cure\u00a0&#8212; they <em>do<\/em> cure] the infection in eight to 24 weeks&#8230; Curing the patient decreases by more than 80 percent the risk of liver cancer, liver failure and the need for a liver transplant, thus saving money in the long run. Successful treatment can also greatly reduce the number of new cases of hepatitis C by preventing transmission of the virus through needle-sharing among drug addicts infected with HIV [HIV has nothing\u00a0to do with it]&#8230; the\u00a0Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, previously a skeptic, estimated that a likely course of treatment with Harvoni would make it a high value for individual patients and for most health care systems.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The editorial goes on to recommend lifting restrictions on treatment, in particular for those who don&#8217;t have advanced liver disease. This makes all kinds of medical sense, and will be great comfort to those of us battling with payors to get treatment to people <em>before<\/em> they have irreversible liver damage from HCV.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile,\u00a0one of our relatively obscure antimicrobials &#8212; pyrimethamine &#8212; has suddenly become <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goodrx.com\/daraprim\" target=\"_blank\">staggeringly expensive.<\/a>\u00a0Used as part of treatment of toxoplasmosis (in particular for patients with AIDS), and rarely for malaria, pyrimethamine has been around for decades. A single pyrimethamine tablet, previously $13.50, now costs $750 &#8212; that&#8217;s a more than 50-fold increase.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not as if new research funded by industry\u00a0has found some novel indication for a previously underused drug.\u00a0Nope,\u00a0this is pure monopolistic pricing &#8212; in mid-August, a company\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/turing-pharmaceuticals-ag-acquires-us-marketing-rights-to-daraprim-pyrimethamine-300125853.html\" target=\"_blank\">purchased the rights to pyrimethamine<\/a>, becoming the exclusive US distributor. As with the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMp1003126\" target=\"_blank\">colchicine saga<\/a>, this exclusivity allows them to dramatically drive up the price because, well, they can.<\/p>\n<p>In short, sometimes you get what you pay for &#8212; and, at least in the case of pyrimethamine, sometimes you don&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>Hey, this video doesn&#8217;t cover treatment, but it sure is funny!<\/p>\n<p>[youtube http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=U9MU-FxsKRg?list=PLoeuxutUxJnkmhX6Rw9mBf_dDEkEy4-VH]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By now, the fact that HCV treatment carries a high price is a fact as well known to the medical and non-medical public as 1) a million dollars doesn&#8217;t get you much in Manhattan or Bay-area real estate; 2) a Rolex is an expensive way to know what time it is; and 3) even though [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,5,8,9],"tags":[44,1072,408,936],"class_list":["post-7669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care","category-hiv","category-infectious-diseases","category-patient-care","category-policy","tag-aids","tag-cost-effectiveness","tag-hcv","tag-toxoplasmosis"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7669\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}