{"id":8182,"date":"2016-09-11T22:38:26","date_gmt":"2016-09-12T02:38:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/?p=8182"},"modified":"2016-09-11T22:38:26","modified_gmt":"2016-09-12T02:38:26","slug":"morgans-vote-favorite-caption","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/morgans-vote-favorite-caption\/2016\/09\/11\/","title":{"rendered":"Poll: More on Morgans, and Vote on Your Favorite Cartoon Caption"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"rex<\/a>During my last post<\/a> on the new HIV testing algorithm, I mentioned that I’d recently met a doctor named “Morgan” for the first time. I also provided actual data<\/em> why this might be an unusual name for a doctor today, but, rarity notwithstanding, we should anticipate more examples of “Morgan —-, MD”\u00a0soon.<\/p>\n

At the end of the post, I wrote: \u00a0“And if there are any other doctors named Morgan out there, I look forward to hearing from\u00a0you.”<\/p>\n

The topic\u00a0prompted a curious\u00a0series of emails\u00a0between\u00a0certain esteemed editors at NEJM Journal Watch <\/em>and me. Below, a (heavily edited and augmented, but bones are unchanged) version for your perusal:<\/p>\n

Esteemed Editor #1 (EE#1):<\/em><\/strong> Hey, did you hear from any doctors named Morgan?
\nMe:<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0Not yet. But in 10 years — there will be plenty! They will be banging down my door! Look at that graph<\/a>! It\u00a0really does seem to be a “generational” kind of name …\u00a0You must know plenty of Morgans. [She’s much younger than I, hence my comment.]<\/em>
\nEE#1:<\/em><\/strong> I personally know ZERO<\/em>\u00a0Morgans.
\nMe:<\/em> <\/strong>\u00a0Hey, how old are you? I’m figuring that most Morgans are\u00a0in their late-20s-30s around now. My nephew is getting married this weekend, he’s around 30. Bet he knows some Morgans.
\nEE#1:<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0Almost 46!!!! [Note the 4 exclamation points.]<\/em> I could have a kid named Morgan. But all of my imaginary kids are named something else.
\nEsteemed Editor #2 (EE#2),<\/em><\/strong> who has been cc’d on these critical emails, but thus far is playing it cool<\/em>:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>Are you implying that you think we are in our 20s? If so, we will love you forever.\u00a0The only Morgan I know is the one from the Mindy Project.<\/a>
\nEsteemed Editor #3 (EE#3), <\/em><\/strong>who’s also been cc’d and now\u00a0can’t resist weighing in:<\/em> \u00a0Morgan Fairchild… not a millennial. Born in 1950! [The internet is cruel.]<\/em>
\nEE#1:<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0Yeah, pretty much the only one I’m familiar with.
\nMe:<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0Morgan Freeman too, though I think of Morgan Fairchild as the true pioneer in the Morganization of the USA.\u00a0And let’s face it, most of\u00a0the young Morgans out there are females.
\nEE#1:<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0Right, it’s a unisex name. But more XX than XY recently.
\nEE#2:<\/em> <\/strong>I can’t believe I forgot about Morgan Freeman! And he won an Academy Award,\u00a0didn’t he?
\nMe:<\/em>\u00a0<\/strong>It was for The Shawshank Redemption. [I don’t really know this, but state it very confidently, at least if there’s an email equivalence of confidence. Guys love “The Shawshank Redemption.” And I’m\u00a0counting on the fact that we’re all so “busy” — as evidenced by these emails — that they’ll\u00a0never fact-check me. Oh well.]<\/em>
\nEE#1:<\/em><\/strong> Wrong! Per Wikipedia: “Freeman won an Academy Award in 2005 for Best Supporting Actor with Million Dollar Baby (2004), and he has received Oscar nominations for his performances in Street Smart (1987), Driving Miss Daisy (1989), The Shawshank Redemption (1994) and Invictus (2009).” So nominated for Shawshank, but didn’t win.\u00a0<\/em>In fact, nominated for a lot!
\nMe:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Did you fact-check Wikipedia? [I got no response to that one.]<\/em> Our readers would think I’d completely lost my mind if I wrote another blog post about doctors and Morgan, but there just might be enough material here.
\nEE#1:<\/strong> \u00a0Well, I\u2019m the blog manager for your blog (and technically I report into EE#2\u00a0for this portion of my job). So, she\u00a0might object to your Morgan-obsession. : ) I’ll defer the final decision …
\nEE#2:<\/strong> \u00a0No objection from me! Make it hilarious. [That will be your assessment. I’m doing my best!]<\/em>
\nEE#1:<\/strong> \u00a0Maybe do a two-topic post, in which Morgan is only one of the topics.
\nMe:<\/strong> Actually, I was just kidding.
\nEE#1:\u00a0<\/strong>Darn, I wish you were serious! Have a nice evening, all!<\/p>\n

Ahem.<\/p>\n

ID doctors, of course, are probably wondering, in our geeky way,\u00a0about whether this all started with\u00a0Morganella morganii<\/em><\/a>, which is possibly fueling my obsession. Double Morgans, after all! And there’s a pretty famous comic with a\u00a0Dr. Morgan name (see above picture), but his first name is Rex. Emphatically not<\/em> Morgan.<\/p>\n

On the subject of comics, it’s\u00a0time to vote on your favorite caption for our last cartoon. After culling through the entries and submitting them to the usual rigorous testing, we’ve arrived at 3 top candidates for this fine drawing. Please vote!<\/p>\n

\"BurgerFireFinalBW\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\t\t

<\/p>\n\t\t

<\/p>\n\t\t

Which is the funniest cartoon caption?<\/strong><\/p>