{"id":8388,"date":"2017-05-21T17:23:32","date_gmt":"2017-05-21T21:23:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/?p=8388"},"modified":"2018-06-07T08:20:08","modified_gmt":"2018-06-07T12:20:08","slug":"curious-case-m184v-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/curious-case-m184v-part-1\/2017\/05\/21\/","title":{"rendered":"The Curious Case of M184V, Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/05\/best-treatment-after-m184v-excellent-question-lets-discuss-further-ec18f.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-8390\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/05\/best-treatment-after-m184v-excellent-question-lets-discuss-further-ec18f.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"319\" height=\"223\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/05\/best-treatment-after-m184v-excellent-question-lets-discuss-further-ec18f.png 420w, https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/05\/best-treatment-after-m184v-excellent-question-lets-discuss-further-ec18f-300x210.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 319px) 100vw, 319px\" \/><\/a>Thanks to our sophisticated\u00a0research team here at <em>NEJM Journal Watch<\/em>, we have an excellent idea who reads this thing for its scintillating ID\/HIV content.<\/p>\n<p>Most of you are clinicians &#8212; doctors, nurses, PAs, PharmDs. A smaller proportion are researchers, lab-oriented types\u00a0who wandered over here unexpectedly after an\u00a0errant search, expecting the latest in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and instead getting\u00a0an <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/crispr-hiv-cure-zinc-colds-new-aidsinfo-site-croi-dates-vanco-pricing-cant-believe-may-id-link-o-rama\/2017\/05\/07\/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HivAndIdObservations+%28HIV+and+ID+Observations%3A+A+Journal+Watch+Blog%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">ID Link-o-Rama<\/a>, a rumination on <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/fun-medical-images\/2017\/01\/22\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">vintage medical photos<\/a>, and a <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/a-mysteriosis-about-listeroisis\/2011\/11\/05\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">mysteriosis about listeriosis.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>But another\u00a0divider is whether you consider yourself an HIV specialist or not. A grab bag of ID (mostly), primary care, and other subspecialty clinicians, HIV specialists know and ruminate over lots of the same stuff even though there&#8217;s no formally designated HIV specialty by the American Board of Internal Medicine.<\/p>\n<p>And today&#8217;s topic is most definitely an HIV-focused one, triggered by an\u00a0email I received last week from one of my colleagues:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Subject: M184V<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Paul,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">What&#8217;s your go-to regimen in the setting of a solo M184V?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Jon<\/p>\n<p>For the <em>non-HIV specialist<\/em> readers, allow me to decipher the code in the above question. &#8220;M184V&#8221; is the shorthand for methionine replacing valine at position 184 in reverse transcriptase. It is by far the most commonly encountered nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutation after failure with regimens containing lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC).<\/p>\n<p>And with that single paragraph, I&#8217;ve hinted\u00a0why HIV drug resistance &#8212; and genotypes in particular &#8212; baffle some of even the most astute\u00a0and brilliant ID clinicians. It&#8217;s like reading about the coagulation cascade or the complement system. You have to work with this stuff frequently\u00a0to understand the lingo.<\/p>\n<p>But for those seeing HIV patients on a regular basis\u00a0(especially as outpatients), this question &#8212; what should be done after M184V? &#8212; is both quite relevant clinically and, surprisingly, not readily answerable from the literature.<\/p>\n<p>Remember, M184V is a special mutation &#8212; it does some very weird things:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Viruses that harbor M184V\u00a0don&#8217;t replicate well.<\/strong> In virology parlance, they&#8217;re &#8220;less fit.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><strong>M184V causes marked\u00a0phenotypic resistance to 3TC\/FTC, but this doesn&#8217;t translate clinically.<\/strong>\u00a0Or, to cite the invaluable <a href=\"https:\/\/hivdb.stanford.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database<\/strong><\/a>, &#8220;M184V\/I are selected by 3TC\/FTC and reduce susceptibility to these drugs &gt;100-fold.&#8221; For an analogy, think of high-level gentamicin resistance in an enterococcus isolate &#8212; but then ignore it and use gentamicin anyway. Because\u00a0unlike these enterococci, where gentamicin would be useless, studies show that 3TC\u00a0still exerts significant antiviral activity despite this loss of phenotypic activity. I&#8217;ve cited these studies before, but they deserve emphasis: <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/cid\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1086\/430709\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Virologic rebound occurred after stopping 3TC<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0in patients who already had developed M184V; and\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16549962\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">3TC alone slowed CD4 decline<\/a><\/strong> more than no treatment despite M184V being present in all patients.<\/li>\n<li><strong>M184V influences the\u00a0<em>in vitro<\/em> susceptibility of certain other NRTIs in a favorable way.<\/strong>\u00a0 Yes, with M184V, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jid\/article\/188\/7\/992\/820920\/Broad-Nucleoside-Reverse-Transcriptase-Inhibitor#14236963\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">susceptibility to tenofovir, zidovudine, and stavudine <em>improves<\/em>.<\/a><\/strong> In other words, an M184V containing virus is more susceptible to tenofovir than a wild-type virus, a phenomenon referred to as hypersusceptibility.\u00a0Someone much smarter than I can explain the molecular mechanism of this phenomenon (it certainly won&#8217;t be me).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Because of these odd effects, and because both 3TC and FTC are so well tolerated, there&#8217;s a practice (not universally observed) of continuing 3TC or FTC\u00a0even after M184V has been selected. But should this be done?<\/p>\n<p>And with that background, let&#8217;s get back to the question in Jon&#8217;s email\u00a0&#8212; what to do after M184V?<\/p>\n<p>Imagine this case &#8212; a patient\u00a0who failed a regimen of dual NRTIs plus an NNRTI (let&#8217;s say TDF\/FTC\/EFV) some time in the past. He had a genotype then\u00a0showing M184V and K103N (conferring resistance to efavirenz), and then was lost to follow-up for a few years.<\/p>\n<p>He now shows up saying he wants to start treatment again. Let&#8217;s give him a CD4 cell count of 250 and a viral load of 50,000. He of course wants as few side effects, and as few pills, as possible.<\/p>\n<p>What would you choose as his antiretroviral regimen?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thanks to our sophisticated\u00a0research team here at NEJM Journal Watch, we have an excellent idea who reads this thing for its scintillating ID\/HIV content. Most of you are clinicians &#8212; doctors, nurses, PAs, PharmDs. A smaller proportion are researchers, lab-oriented types\u00a0who wandered over here unexpectedly after an\u00a0errant search, expecting the latest in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[15,373,385,423,580,801],"class_list":["post-8388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care","tag-3tc","tag-ftc","tag-genotype","tag-hiv","tag-m184v","tag-resistance"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}