{"id":8497,"date":"2017-10-15T15:51:03","date_gmt":"2017-10-15T19:51:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/?p=8497"},"modified":"2017-10-15T17:55:33","modified_gmt":"2017-10-15T21:55:33","slug":"best-antiretroviral-therapy-pregnant-women-controversy-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/best-antiretroviral-therapy-pregnant-women-controversy-continues\/2017\/10\/15\/","title":{"rendered":"The Best Antiretroviral Therapy for Pregnant Women? The Controversy Continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s considerable controversy in an area of HIV medicine that one would think should be all but solved by now.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s what HIV treatment we should give pregnant women.<\/p>\n<p>The issue isn&#8217;t how to prevent the virus from being transmitted to the newborn &#8212; suppress the virus in mom, baby doesn&#8217;t get it &#8212; it&#8217;s what&#8217;s safest for the pregnancy outcome.<\/p>\n<p>The uncertainty spills over to the <a href=\"https:\/\/aidsinfo.nih.gov\/guidelines\/html\/3\/perinatal-guidelines\/487\/table-6---what-to-start--initial-combination-regimens-for-antiretroviral-naive-pregnant-women\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HIV perinatal guidelines<\/a>, which are notable for <a href=\"https:\/\/aidsinfo.nih.gov\/guidelines\/html\/1\/adult-and-adolescent-arv\/0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">how different they are from those for non-pregnant adults:<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Table_6__What_to_Start__Initial_Combination_Regimens_for_Antiretroviral-Naive_Pregnant_Women___Perinatal___AIDSinfo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-8498\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Table_6__What_to_Start__Initial_Combination_Regimens_for_Antiretroviral-Naive_Pregnant_Women___Perinatal___AIDSinfo.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"515\" height=\"420\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Table_6__What_to_Start__Initial_Combination_Regimens_for_Antiretroviral-Naive_Pregnant_Women___Perinatal___AIDSinfo.jpg 753w, https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Table_6__What_to_Start__Initial_Combination_Regimens_for_Antiretroviral-Naive_Pregnant_Women___Perinatal___AIDSinfo-300x245.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 515px) 100vw, 515px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Taken literally, these guidelines would support a regimen of ABC\/3TC and twice-daily DRV\/r for a pregnant woman &#8212; something we&#8217;d never prescribe a non pregnant treatment-naive patient for several obvious reasons.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, there is only one integrase inhibitor-based regimen &#8212; TDF\/FTC, raltegravir &#8212; while INSTI-based regimens dominate the general recommendations for HIV treatment. There just aren&#8217;t enough data yet on the use dolutegravir in pregnancy, though we did <a href=\"http:\/\/programme.ias2017.org\/Abstract\/Abstract\/5532\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">see some encouraging information<\/a> during the IAS meeting this summer. And information on tenofovir alafenamide are scant.<\/p>\n<p>Now, potentially making HIV treatment during pregnancy even <em>more<\/em> divergent from standard-of-care, non-pregnancy treatment, comes a surprising <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/358\/bmj.j3961?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=tbmj&amp;hootPostID=7f691c576845c29fb7b259bf0b260d65\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">new set of recommendations from the <em>British Medical Journal. <\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Entitled\u00a0<em>Antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women living with HIV: a clinical practice guideline,\u00a0<\/em>the paper recommends using zidovudine\/lamivudine over tenofovir DF\/emtricitabine during pregnancy:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Antiretroviral_therapy_in_pregnant_women_living_with_HIV__a_clinical_practice_guideline___The_BMJ.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-8500\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Antiretroviral_therapy_in_pregnant_women_living_with_HIV__a_clinical_practice_guideline___The_BMJ.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"511\" height=\"268\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Antiretroviral_therapy_in_pregnant_women_living_with_HIV__a_clinical_practice_guideline___The_BMJ.jpg 903w, https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Antiretroviral_therapy_in_pregnant_women_living_with_HIV__a_clinical_practice_guideline___The_BMJ-300x157.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/10\/Antiretroviral_therapy_in_pregnant_women_living_with_HIV__a_clinical_practice_guideline___The_BMJ-768x402.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 511px) 100vw, 511px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s their stated reason for this surprising recommendation:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Tenofovir and emtricitabine probably increase the risk of early neonatal death and preterm delivery &lt;34 weeks compared with zidovudine and lamivudine; this is more certain when they are combined with lopinavir\/ritonavir.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Importantly, most of the data they cite in support of this recommendation come from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1511691#t=article\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the PROMISE study<\/a>, which did show higher rates of very preterm delivery before 34 weeks and early infant death with TDF\/FTC compared with ZDV (a.k.a. AZT)\/3TC. But an important caveat is that the drugs were given with LPV\/r at high dose, a regimen we rarely use today, and which substantially increases tenofovir levels.<\/p>\n<p>The authors of the PROMISE study themselves responded to the <em>BMJ\u00a0<\/em>piece, stating that they do not agree with the recommendation to use ZDV\/3TC over TDF\/FTC for several reasons. While I encourage people interested in this topic to read their full comment, they cite\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4767604\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">important observational data on the use of TDF\/FTC\/EFV:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Compared with a regimen of TDF-emtricitabine (FTC)-EFV, all other regimens, including AZT-based ART, were associated with higher risk of adverse outcome; increased risk of preterm birth, very preterm birth and neonatal death were observed for infants exposed to AZT-lamivudine (3TC)-lopinavir-ritonavir.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Plus, we can add to these reassuring data a <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jid\/article-abstract\/doi\/10.1093\/infdis\/jix542\/4430503\/Maternal-tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate-use-during#.Wd3eJVd00O0.twitter\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">new paper<\/a>, just published in the <em>Journal of Infectious Diseases.\u00a0<\/em>In a prospective evaluation of 422 pregnancies, the researchers found that TDF was not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, and that preterm birth occurred less frequently among pregnancies exposed to TDF.<\/p>\n<p>My take? We know from <em>thirty years<\/em> (yep, it&#8217;s been that long) of experience that ZDV has considerable toxicity &#8212; subjective side effects such as nausea and headache, and additional problems related to mitochondrial toxicity, including bone marrow suppression, lipoatrophy, and lactic acidosis.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, it&#8217;s very hard to imagine prescribing zidovudine again under any circumstances, including during pregnancy. Today, the most commonly used initial regimen at our hospital during pregnancy is TDF\/FTC and raltegravir; if patients are on a successful treatment and become pregnant, we generally continue that, almost regardless of what it is.<\/p>\n<p>And we eagerly await the results of a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03048422?cond=Dolutegravir-containing&amp;rank=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">three-arm study in pregnant women<\/a>, led by my colleague Shahin Lockman, which is just getting started. It compares TAF\/FTC plus dolutegravir, TDF\/FTC plus dolutegravir, and TDF\/FTC\/EFV.<\/p>\n<p>This, we hope, will move treatment of pregnant women with HIV closer to the treatment we offer non-pregnant adults.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/secure.jwatch.org\/registerm?cpc=JWATCH&amp;promo=OJFOBLOG&amp;step=1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-925\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/03\/hivJWAd540x250.jpg\" alt=\"Register Now for more NEJM Journal Watch Content\" width=\"540\" height=\"250\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s considerable controversy in an area of HIV medicine that one would think should be all but solved by now. It&#8217;s what HIV treatment we should give pregnant women. The issue isn&#8217;t how to prevent the virus from being transmitted to the newborn &#8212; suppress the virus in mom, baby doesn&#8217;t get it &#8212; it&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[284,423,1159,908],"class_list":["post-8497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care","tag-dolutegravir","tag-hiv","tag-pregnancy","tag-tenofovir"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8497"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8497\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nejm.org\/hiv-id-observations\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}