July 16th, 2013
Follow-up after Barrett esophagus ablation: How do you do it, and when do you stop (if ever)?
We have shifted the paradigm of treating neoplastic Barrett esophagus (BE) away from a choice between intensive surveillance or surgery and towards endoscopic ablation. In the last 5 years, I have done hundreds of BE ablations using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and many thousands have been performed worldwide. However, on post-ablation surveillance, evidence is lacking on whether and when patients can be cut loose. Moreover, I am beginning to see patients who were believed to be cured after ablation (no signs of BE or neoplasia during years of surveillance) showing up with adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus 4 or more years later.
Until now, I have been telling my patients that once they are BE- and dysplasia-free, I want them to undergo surveillance every 4 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 1 year, then yearly for a couple of years, and then every other year if things remain stable.
But given the uncertainties I’ve outlined above, I am interested in discussing your practices and recommendations for surveillance after ablation for BE.
On that note, what would your approach be in the following cases?
1) If a patient with high-grade dysplasia has their BE completely ablated (no BE and no dysplasia), what surveillance period do you recommend for the following year? Year two? Beyond 2 years?
2) If a patient with low-grade dysplasia has their BE completely ablated (no BE and no dysplasia), what surveillance period do you recommend for the following year? Year two? Beyond 2 years?
3) If a patient with NO dysplasia has their BE completely ablated (no BE and no dysplasia), what surveillance period do you recommend for the following year? Year two? Beyond 2 years?
4) Do you ever tell patients that they are cured and no longer need surveillance (e.g., after 5 years, after 10 years, etc.)?
5) If a patient with dysplasia has their neoplastic BE completely ablated (no dysplasia but residual BE), what surveillance period do you recommend for the following year? Year two? Beyond 2 years?
Please join the discussion to shed some light on this issue.
Categories: Barrett esophagus, cancer surveillance, Patient care, practice environment, Uncategorized
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.

M. Brian Fennerty, MD
Founding Editor
NEJM Journal Watch Gastroenterology
Learn more about Gut Check on Gastroenterology.
Search the Archive
Archives by Date
From NEJM: Recently in Gastroenterology- Breaking the RAS Barrier in Pancreatic Cancer July 23, 2026For decades, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been perhaps the clearest example of a cancer that is driven by a dominant oncogenic event yet is resistant to therapeutic exploitation. More than 90% of pancreatic cancers harbor activating RAS mutations, most commonly those involving KRAS codon 12,...
- National Elimination of Hepatitis C — The Case for Starting in Prisons and Jails July 23, 2026The United States could take meaningful steps toward eliminating hepatitis C by broadly testing and treating people who are involved in the criminal legal system.
- Daraxonrasib or Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer July 23, 2026Among patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the RAS(ON) inhibitor daraxonrasib led to significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than chemotherapy.
- Case 20-2026: A 38-Year-Old Man with Abdominal Pain July 16, 2026A 38-year-old man was evaluated at the hospital because of postprandial abdominal pain. Six weeks earlier, a diarrheal illness had developed while he was working in Madagascar. A diagnosis was made.
- Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Adults July 9, 2026During the acute phase of critical illness, early restrictive-dose enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition to support gut integrity. Full-dose enteral nutrition increases the risk of adverse effects.
- Breaking the RAS Barrier in Pancreatic Cancer July 23, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Ambulatory endoscopy center antiretroviral therapy Barrett esophagus boceprevir bowel preparation CMS colitis colonoscopy colorectal cancer screening CT colonography DDW drug interactions efavirenz endoscopist Endoscopy gastroenterology GI bleeding hepatitis HIV IBS Irritable Bowel Syndrome Medicare midazolam nurse Plavix PPIs primary care probiotics ritonavir Screening colonoscopy sedation sigmoidoscopy telaprevir training virtual colonoscopy
