5 Responses to “Is it time to stop surveying Barrett esophagus?”
M. Brian Fennerty, MD
Founding Editor
NEJM Journal Watch Gastroenterology
Learn more about Gut Check on Gastroenterology.
From NEJM: Recently in Gastroenterology- Global Cholera-Control Efforts — Progress and Remaining Challenges June 6, 2026If the current cholera pandemic, which began in 1961, is ever to end, the world will need better cholera vaccines that are effective in young children and global access to safe water and adequate sanitation.
- Dysphagia Lusoria June 4, 2026A 44-year-old man presented with a 4-year history of choking episodes while eating. Endoscopy revealed narrowing of the upper esophagus by a pulsating, cordlike structure in the posterior wall (shown in a video).
- Fasting, Glucocorticoids, and Breast Cancer June 4, 2026A study dissects the way in which fasting or a fasting-mimicking diet augments the effect of hormonal therapy in a mouse model of breast cancer.
- The Unusual Suspects June 4, 2026A 53-year-old man with Crohn’s disease and psoriasis presented with a 2-day history of headache, slurred speech, nausea, and vomiting. During the previous 2 weeks, he had had yellowing of the skin and eyes and dark urine.
- Obexelimab for the Treatment of IgG4-Related Disease June 2, 2026In a phase 3 trial, obexelimab led to a lower risk of disease flares than placebo among patients with IgG4-related disease. Glucocorticoid use was lower and the incidence of remission was higher with obexelimab than with placebo.
- Global Cholera-Control Efforts — Progress and Remaining Challenges June 6, 2026
I’m not a doctor but the thought of money being detrimental to the screening for BE is scary….On the other hand, I’m a business owner and understand how business runs!! Mmmmm…interesting discussion. I’ll keep checking in to see how it unfolds.
I, too, am not a doctor, but I have Barrett esophagus. I’ve been having periodic screenings at my gastroenterologist’s suggestion because my father had esophageal cancer. The incidence of cancer in a population may be low, but it needs to be a decision the doctor and patient make together, depending on the patient’s circumstances and medical history.
I think this issue is exemplary of how different points of view can be conflicting. On one side the societal perspective suggests continuing monitoring of BE isn’t worthwhile, the balance being between effectiveness and cost. On the other side the individual perspective affirms: “a low, or very low risk isn’t no risk at all therefore I’d like to continue monitoring even if it produces little good unless the balance between harm and good is decidely shifted”. The sound rationale against PSA screening conjugates the societal perspective: “it is useless” with the individual perspective: “it can do more harm than good”. Until harm from BE monitoring is documented a clearcut position on this issue will be difficult at a clinical level although I feel there is now adequate evidence to reconsidere BE monitoring in the coverage of Health Plans
We should stop surveying Barrett esophagus，but it is not now，why？TO some patient，it saves money，to others，lt means the lost of the chance of early detection for cancer。so，at least by now，we should continue it，but not to all patient。Who should？maybe
patient with high risks into tumor？Now，who is patient with high risks into tumor？it is the key，if we get the key，we solve the problem。
An asymptomatic person does not need a workup but should be endoscoped if a family history of BE exists. A person with esophagitis symptoms would likely be endoscoped; if dysplastic BE is found, that person needs
followup and possible therapy. If non-dysplastic BE is found, we await the next controlled study to determine the appropriate next step. Simple.