March 14th, 2009
Sedating HIV-Infected Endoscopy Patients
In a recent blog post, ID expert Paul Sax raised the question of which sedatives should be used when scoping HIV-infected patients on ritonavir or efavirenz. Both antiretrovirals inhibit the CYP3A enzyme, which metabolizes one of our most commonly used sedatives, midazolam. Use of midazolam with either antiretroviral is technically contraindicated because of significant increases that occur in blood levels of midazolam. So how do we sedate our HIV-infected colonoscopy patients?
The same as we do all our endoscopy patients: We titrate midazolam for effect. In my mind, there is little reason to view this drug as “contraindicated” with ritonavir or efavirenz. Increased blood levels of midazolam should lead to adequate sedation at lower doses without the potential for over-sedation, assuming the midazolam is used appropriately — that is, infused at a low dose with a reassessment of effect and level of sedation before additional doses are given.
However, Paul noted in his blog that lorazepam (Ativan) and other drugs are sometimes substituted for midazolam in this situation or that the patient’s ritonavir is stopped the day before midazolam is used. Frankly, the mention of these practices surprised me and led me to conduct this informal poll…
What do you do when you encounter these patients?
Categories: Endoscopy, Patient care
Tags: antiretroviral therapy, colonoscopy, efavirenz, HIV, midazolam, ritonavir, sedation
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “Sedating HIV-Infected Endoscopy Patients”

M. Brian Fennerty, MD
Founding Editor
NEJM Journal Watch Gastroenterology
Learn more about Gut Check on Gastroenterology.
Search the Archive
Archives by Date
From NEJM: Recently in Gastroenterology- Colorectal Cancer Risk among Patients with Serrated Polyps September 17, 2026In this prospective trial, patients with serrated polyps had a low 5-year risk of colorectal cancer (1.0%).
- When More Is Not Better — Colonoscopy Surveillance after High-Risk Adenomas September 17, 2026Colonoscopy surveillance after the removal of adenomas is a cornerstone of the prevention of colorectal cancer. Guidelines in the United States and Europe have endorsed surveillance beginning at 3 years after the removal of advanced adenomas (defined as ≥1 adenoma with a diameter of ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, or villous...
- Celiac-Artery Dissection September 17, 2026A 72-year-old man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and a stable ascending aortic aneurysm presented with sudden-onset, severe chest pain. CTA of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed a celiac-artery dissection.
- Initial Screening for Colorectal Cancer September 17, 2026This feature about colorectal cancer screening in a 46-year-old man offers a case vignette accompanied by two essays, one recommending screening by colonoscopy and the other supporting use of a stool-based test.
- Esophageal Cancer September 17, 2026For patients with esophageal cancer, 5-year survival has improved in recent decades but rarely exceeds 20%. This review summarizes risk factors, screening, and treatment for the two main histologic types.
- Colorectal Cancer Risk among Patients with Serrated Polyps September 17, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Ambulatory endoscopy center antiretroviral therapy Barrett esophagus boceprevir bowel preparation CMS colitis colonoscopy colorectal cancer screening CT colonography DDW drug interactions efavirenz endoscopist Endoscopy gastroenterology GI bleeding hepatitis HIV IBS Irritable Bowel Syndrome Medicare midazolam nurse Plavix PPIs primary care probiotics ritonavir Screening colonoscopy sedation sigmoidoscopy telaprevir training virtual colonoscopy

Brian, thanks for getting this issue out there to your GI colleagues. We have a meeting with the group in charge of policy on “conscious sedation,” and this specific question will be discussed — hope to get it resolved.
Just for the record, our HIV patients now have a projected life expectancy estimated to be decades — cancer screening recommendations that apply to HIV negative patients apply equally to them. Furthermore, the vast majority of HIV patients on antiviral therapy are receiving either efavirenz or ritonavir, so this issue of sedation for colonoscopies is a highly relevant question.
Propofol