September 11th, 2014
Is This Trial Ethical?
CardioExchange Editors, Staff
Last month, an article appeared in The Telegraph (U.K.) describing a randomized trial in which cardiac arrest patients will be assigned to receive epinephrine or placebo during resuscitation.
Current ALCS guidelines contain a Class IIb, level A recommendation for administration of epinephrine for sustained VF and PEA/asystole but acknowledge that although epinephrine treatment has been demonstrated to increase rates of return of spontaneous circulation, it has not been shown to improve long-term survival.
This is not the first time epinephrine and placebo have been compared in a randomized trial; results of such a trial appeared in Resuscitation in 2011. Nonetheless, the new trial appears to have sparked ethical concerns about its delayed-consent procedure.
What do you think? Would you support such a trial in your EMS system?
Categories: General
Tags: advanced cardiac life support, cardiac arrest, epinephrine, informed consent, resuscitation
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.
Search the Archive
Archives by Date
NEJM — Recent Cardiology Articles- Prescription without Precision — Dangers of Dosing on the Basis of Race as Biology June 6, 2026Despite recognition that racial and ethnic categories are poor proxies for genetic diversity, race is still used to guide pharmaceutical use, posing risks of ineffectively low or dangerously high dosing.
- Finerenone in Persons with Chronic Kidney Disease without Diabetes June 4, 2026In adults without diabetes who had chronic kidney disease, the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone led to a slower decrease in the estimate glomerular filtration rate than placebo over 32 months.
- Intention to Treat — Season 2: The Race Equation: BiDil — The Story of the Black Pill — ITT Episode 2.5 June 4, 2026How did a drug for congestive heart failure get approved and marketed for Black people only?
- Left Atrial Appendage Closure — Should Recommendations Be Expanded? June 4, 2026Owing to the fact that most thromboembolic complications that are attributed to atrial fibrillation originate in the left atrial appendage,1 therapies targeting the anatomical structure that might spare systemic harms are theoretically attractive. Randomized trials of left atrial appendage closure previously garnered an American College of Cardiology–American Heart...
- Left Atrial Appendage Closure or Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation June 4, 2026In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure was noninferior to NOACs in an analysis of death from cardiovascular causes, stroke, or systemic embolism and was superior for non–procedure-related bleeding.
- Prescription without Precision — Dangers of Dosing on the Basis of Race as Biology June 6, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- ACS AF AHA anticoagulation aortic valve replacement apixaban aspirin atrial fibrillation CABG cardiovascular risk cholesterol clopidogrel dabigatran diabetes diet drug-eluting stents epidemiology ESC exercise FDA FDA approvals Fellowship training guidelines HDL heart failure hypertension ICDs MI myocardial infarction obesity PCI Primary PCI risk factors rivaroxaban statins STEMI stents stroke stroke prevention TAVI TAVR type 2 diabetes venous thromboembolism warfarin women
