September 11th, 2014
Is This Trial Ethical?
CardioExchange Editors, Staff
Last month, an article appeared in The Telegraph (U.K.) describing a randomized trial in which cardiac arrest patients will be assigned to receive epinephrine or placebo during resuscitation.
Current ALCS guidelines contain a Class IIb, level A recommendation for administration of epinephrine for sustained VF and PEA/asystole but acknowledge that although epinephrine treatment has been demonstrated to increase rates of return of spontaneous circulation, it has not been shown to improve long-term survival.
This is not the first time epinephrine and placebo have been compared in a randomized trial; results of such a trial appeared in Resuscitation in 2011. Nonetheless, the new trial appears to have sparked ethical concerns about its delayed-consent procedure.
What do you think? Would you support such a trial in your EMS system?
Categories: General
Tags: advanced cardiac life support, cardiac arrest, epinephrine, informed consent, resuscitation
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.
Search the Archive
Archives by Date
NEJM — Recent Cardiology Articles- The Invisible Load of Cognitive Symptoms July 2, 2026Patients with shrinking cognitive bandwidth may feel their disability keenly in daily life, even if they can pass a controlled test of cognitive capacity. How should clinicians approach and care for them?
- Angiography-Based Physiology to Guide Coronary Revascularization July 2, 2026Among patients with intermediate coronary lesions, angiography-guided revascularization was noninferior to pressure-wire–based guidance with respect to death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization.
- Redefining Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory July 2, 2026Since the introduction of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the late 1970s, the field has evolved immensely with respect to indications, devices, and adjunctive pharmacotherapy. One of the defining transitions was the move from anatomy-guided PCI, based largely on subjective angiographic eyeballing, to physiology-guided revascularization. The Fractional Flow Reserve versus...
- Science behind the Study: Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease July 2, 2026The author describes the scientific foundations of two trials comparing how noninvasive and invasive assessments of fractional flow reserve affect clinical outcomes.
- Toward Broader Adoption of Coronary Physiological Assessment July 2, 2026Randomized trials have shown that physiological assessment of coronary lesions with a coronary pressure wire improves outcomes and reduces unnecessary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with angiography-guided care.1 However, despite class I guideline recommendations, coronary physiological assessment remains underused.2 Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) has...
- The Invisible Load of Cognitive Symptoms July 2, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- ACS AF AHA anticoagulation aortic valve replacement apixaban aspirin atrial fibrillation CABG cardiovascular risk cholesterol clopidogrel dabigatran diabetes diet drug-eluting stents epidemiology ESC exercise FDA FDA approvals Fellowship training guidelines HDL heart failure hypertension ICDs MI myocardial infarction obesity PCI Primary PCI risk factors rivaroxaban statins STEMI stents stroke stroke prevention TAVI TAVR type 2 diabetes venous thromboembolism warfarin women
