An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
July 29th, 2008
Antiretroviral Rounds: Immediate ART After an OI — Are We There Yet?
A few things have been guaranteed to get widely divergent views among HIV specialists — and one of them was when to start antiretroviral therapy in someone presenting with an acute OI. However, in the latest Antiretroviral Rounds, our two experts (Raphy Landovitz and Phil Grant/Andrew Zolopa) kind of agreed. They’d start immediately.
At least that’s what they said. What do we do? What do you do?
Categories: Antiretroviral Rounds, HIV, Infectious Diseases, Patient Care
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
3 Responses to “Antiretroviral Rounds: Immediate ART After an OI — Are We There Yet?”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
- When AI Gets the Medical Advice Wrong — and Right
- How the Z-Pak Took Over Outpatient Medicine
- Rabies Is Terrifying — and the Challenge of Managing a Low Risk of a Dreadful Disease
- Influenza — So Familiar, Still So Mysterious
- Florida Moves to Cut AIDS Drug Assistance Program — and Drops the Most Prescribed HIV Regimen in the Country
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
- Florida Moves to Cut AIDS Drug Assistance Program — and Drops the Most Prescribed HIV Regimen in the Country January 27, 2026
- Rabies Is Terrifying — and the Challenge of Managing a Low Risk of a Dreadful Disease January 21, 2026
- Influenza — So Familiar, Still So Mysterious January 14, 2026
- How the Z-Pak Took Over Outpatient Medicine, Part 2: The Reckoning January 6, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- A Pediatrician’s Dilemma — Pushing Back against CDC Guidance in the Exam Room February 7, 2026When a mother cites the CDC as her source of dangerous misinformation about vaccines, her child’s pediatrician struggles: how hard can a doctor push back without destroying the trust built over a lifetime?
- A Matter of Time February 5, 2026A 29-year-old woman with active opioid, alcohol, benzodiazepine, tobacco, and cocaine use disorders and recent intravenous drug use presented with acute onset of chills and increased pain and drainage of chronic wounds in both legs.
- Antigenic Drift and Antivaccine Shift in the 2025–2026 Influenza Season February 4, 2026Both viral and host factors have contributed to the intensity of influenza activity during the 2025–2026 season. Some of these factors can be managed, whereas others are largely beyond human control.
- Case 4-2026: An 80-Year-Old Woman with Cough and Hypoxemia January 29, 2026An 80-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital because of cough and hypoxemia (oxygen saturation, 83%). CT of the chest showed diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs. A diagnosis was made.
- The Essential Role of States in Protecting Immunization Access January 29, 2026In the face of U.S. federal policy shifts that threaten to destabilize vaccine access and weaken clinical guidance, states can step in and protect their residents.
- A Pediatrician’s Dilemma — Pushing Back against CDC Guidance in the Exam Room February 7, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster

I never start with Atripla per se, but split it as Truvada plus Sustiva for the first month or so, in case pt doesn’t tolerate efavirenz side effects.
Practicing in New York city I see many patients similar to the case that was described.
The immediate versus delayed initiation of ART in my view should depend on CD4 count. I may start ART in a patient with CD4>100 earlier than the one with CD4<50.
The lower the CD4 count the more chance of other hidden OIs . These infections should be screened first before initiating ART . This can be done safely in 2-4 weeks with special screening for significant OIs like CMV, crypt, etc….
This lag in initiation of ART and the medication/s needed for treatment of thepresenting OI while screening for other OIs also safeguard us against complexity of overlapping side effects by introducing the medications stepwise. Patient tolerance improves and compliance improves as well.
Excellent site, keep up the good work