An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
October 3rd, 2011
CASCADE: When to Start, (Yet) Another Take
As we await the enrollment, analysis, and results of the START study — which is randomizing patients with CD4>500 to start HIV therapy vs waiting until the CD4 falls to 350 — much of the research on “when to start” ART in patients with high CD4’s comes from observational studies. Several have already been published (NA-ACCORD, ART-CC, CAUSAL), but one limitation of each of them is that none could accurately assess duration of HIV infection.
Enter “CASCADE“, or “Concerted Action on SeroConversion to AIDS and Death in Europe”. CASCADE includes patients from Europe, Australia, and Canada only if they have a defined date of HIV acquisition, thereby limiting effects of lead-time bias. In order to get at the when-to-start question, the investigators constructed something called “nested subcohorts” between 1996 and 2009, comparing the outcomes of those who started ART vs. those who didn’t.
The results? Out of 9,455 patients, starting ART (vs deferring) was associated with a lower risk of developing AIDS or death for those with a CD4 cell count < 500 — but not for those who started between 500-799. An interesting aspect of this study is that they were able to calculate a “number needed to treat” (NNT) to prevent progression. Over 3 years of follow-up, 21 and 34 patients would need to start treatment to prevent one patient from progressing to AIDS or death in those with CD4s between 200-349 and 350-499 respectively.
Usual caveats of observational studies apply — most notably that no such study can control for all factors between those who started ART vs those who didn’t that would influence outcome — but the results are helpful nonetheless, as the benefits of therapy before the CD4 cell count falls to < 350 shown here have been consistently seen in multiple studies. Furthermore, the NNT data to prevent AIDS or death — 34 for CD4 between 350-499 — place the benefits of treating these patients as even greater than what we accomplish with statin therapy for hypercholesterolemia to prevent MIs, which is estimated as 40-70.
Bottom line: Treating patients with CD4 350-500 and no symptoms may not be as exciting giving ART to someone with advanced HIV disease, but it sure makes good clinical sense.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Ensitrelvir for Covid-19 Postexposure Prophylaxis in Household Contacts May 14, 2026In a trial, the 3C-like protease inhibitor ensitrelvir was more effective than placebo in preventing Covid-19 in household contacts of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- Cerebral Syphilitic Gumma May 14, 2026A 50-year-old man presented to the ED with a 1-month history of headache and worsening weakness of the left arm and leg. Brain MRI showed an enhancing lesion with extensive surrounding edema.
- Getting Serious about Tickborne Diseases — Shifting Research Priorities May 13, 2026Research on Lyme disease has emphasized clinical disease and pathogen microbiology rather than the root cause: the infected tick vectors in the environment, which remain uncontrolled.
- Human Infection with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N5) Virus May 7, 2026Avian influenza can jump species from birds to humans, a fact that arouses concern for serious illness and broader human transmission. In this report, avian influenza A(H5N5) was shown to cause severe human illness.
- Reducing Bacterial Contamination of Blood Bags with a Double Knot May 7, 2026In a study involving 180 blood bags, use of a double-knot closure rather than the usual single knot prevented bacterial contamination. This strategy may reduce the risk of blood-product contamination in resource-limited settings.
- Ensitrelvir for Covid-19 Postexposure Prophylaxis in Household Contacts May 14, 2026