An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
January 8th, 2012
Journal Club: In Early HIV Infection, Little Reason to Delay Therapy
Every experienced HIV clinician will recognize the following new-patient scenario:
- At least one, but often several negative HIV antibody tests in the past, generally due to being in a “high risk” group.
- Recent non-specific viral-type illness that, in hindsight, was undoubtedly acute HIV infection, undiagnosed.
- Now completely recovered, but found to be newly HIV antibody positive.
- Physical exam normal, CD4 500 or higher, HIV RNA in the moderate range (10-100K).
How should patients like these be managed? Specifically, should antiretroviral therapy be started, or should they be observed?
Over in Journal of Infectious Diseases, the so-called Setpoint study — a randomized strategy trial — investigated whether a 36-week period of treatment would delay the need to go on continuous HIV therapy, compared with observation. After 130 of a planned 150 patients were enrolled, a Data Safety Monitoring Board elected to stop the study due to this key finding: “… the higher rate of progression to needing treatment in the Deferred Treatment group (50%) versus the Immediate Treatment (10%) group.”
Importantly, the findings would have been even stronger in favor of Immediate Treatment if more up-to-date CD4 thresholds (500 rather than 350) were used as a criterion to start therapy. (The study was designed in the mid 2000s.)
How do these results influence practice? As I’ve noted before, patients diagnosed with recently-acquired HIV infection should be counseled that even if treatment is deferred, there is a high likelihood they will need to start treatment relatively soon.
It’s also time to retire the “you may have 10 years before needing to go on therapy” counseling, something we might have been prone to do in the past to soften the blow of someone hearing that they’re HIV positive. This kind of delay is highly unlikely, and may be limited to the small fraction of patients who have very low HIV RNA and very high CD4s.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- A Regional Measles Outbreak — South Carolina, 2025–2026 August 13, 2026In South Carolina, 997 measles cases occurred in the reported outbreak. In one health care system, 81 cases were identified. Most were in unvaccinated persons; 13 persons were hospitalized, and 2 had measles encephalitis.
- iEvac-Z, an Inactivated Ebola Vaccine — Phase 1 Study in Japan August 13, 2026Ebola virus continues to be a global threat. In a phase 1 study, an inactivated Ebola virus vaccine was tested in healthy volunteers for safety and immunogenicity.
- Long-Acting Treatment and Advanced HIV Disease — Addressing a Public Health Priority August 13, 2026Without deliberate efforts to evaluate long-acting injectable ART in the populations that need these therapies most, their benefits may accrue primarily to people who are well served by existing systems.
- Disseminated Fusariosis August 13, 2026A 61-year-old man with prolonged neutropenia after chemotherapy for AML was evaluated for persistent fever despite antimicrobial therapy. Physical examination was notable for a skin macule with central necrosis on the chest.
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients Infected with Bundibugyo Virus, DRC 2026 August 6, 2026Bundibugyo virus, a filovirus, is currently spreading in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This report presents early data on symptoms and illness severity as well as diagnostic challenges.
- A Regional Measles Outbreak — South Carolina, 2025–2026 August 13, 2026