An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
January 8th, 2012
Journal Club: In Early HIV Infection, Little Reason to Delay Therapy
Every experienced HIV clinician will recognize the following new-patient scenario:
- At least one, but often several negative HIV antibody tests in the past, generally due to being in a “high risk” group.
- Recent non-specific viral-type illness that, in hindsight, was undoubtedly acute HIV infection, undiagnosed.
- Now completely recovered, but found to be newly HIV antibody positive.
- Physical exam normal, CD4 500 or higher, HIV RNA in the moderate range (10-100K).
How should patients like these be managed? Specifically, should antiretroviral therapy be started, or should they be observed?
Over in Journal of Infectious Diseases, the so-called Setpoint study — a randomized strategy trial — investigated whether a 36-week period of treatment would delay the need to go on continuous HIV therapy, compared with observation. After 130 of a planned 150 patients were enrolled, a Data Safety Monitoring Board elected to stop the study due to this key finding: “… the higher rate of progression to needing treatment in the Deferred Treatment group (50%) versus the Immediate Treatment (10%) group.”
Importantly, the findings would have been even stronger in favor of Immediate Treatment if more up-to-date CD4 thresholds (500 rather than 350) were used as a criterion to start therapy. (The study was designed in the mid 2000s.)
How do these results influence practice? As I’ve noted before, patients diagnosed with recently-acquired HIV infection should be counseled that even if treatment is deferred, there is a high likelihood they will need to start treatment relatively soon.
It’s also time to retire the “you may have 10 years before needing to go on therapy” counseling, something we might have been prone to do in the past to soften the blow of someone hearing that they’re HIV positive. This kind of delay is highly unlikely, and may be limited to the small fraction of patients who have very low HIV RNA and very high CD4s.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Shock Not Advised April 25, 2026A physician offers to help in a medical emergency on a transatlantic flight. Though she faces limits of bureaucracy, equipment, and ultimately biology, she discovers her physicianhood is inescapable.
- Balanced Fluid or 0.9% Saline in Children Treated for Septic Shock April 24, 2026In children with septic shock, no significant difference was seen in the incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent kidney dysfunction with balanced fluid as compared with 0.9% saline for fluid resuscitation.
- Tuberculosis Cases and Deaths Averted by PEPFAR April 23, 2026Tuberculosis remains a leading cause of death worldwide among persons with HIV. In this report, the effect of the PEPFAR program on incident cases of tuberculosis and related deaths is presented.
- Case 12-2026: An 86-Year-Old Woman with Anorexia, Weight Loss, and Liver Lesions April 23, 2026An 86-year-old woman with a history of diabetes and breast cancer was admitted to the hospital with anorexia and weight loss. Imaging revealed multifocal liver lesions. A diagnosis was made.
- Same Pill, Different Impact — Reassessing the Efficacy of Nirmatrelvir–Ritonavir April 23, 2026The first cases of Covid-19 were reported at the end of 2019, and from January 20, 2020, to May 5, 2023, Covid-19 was considered to be a public health emergency of international concern. The total number of cases worldwide exceeded 1 million by early April 2020. In the United States,...
- Shock Not Advised April 25, 2026