An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
February 5th, 2018
The Four States of Clinical Medicine, and a Movie Review (Sort Of)
I finally saw The Big Sick.
And hooray, it’s excellent. 9/10. Based loosely on the real-life courtship between comedian Kumail Nanjiani and writer Emily V. Gordon, the movie has great word of mouth, is making gobs of money for an independent comedy, and was nominated for Best Original Screenplay.
Deserves both the the accolades and the cash.
In its way, the movie perfectly captures the Four States of Clinical Medicine, which my sister has expertly drawn for me in this 2X2 table:
One of the characters spends a good deal of the movie in Box 4 (not getting better, diagnosis unknown), which clinicians will immediately recognize as the very worst box to be in.
All of our efforts sometimes seem directed at moving patients out of Box 4. Even Box 3 (not getting better, diagnosis known) is preferable, though it’s not as if these patients are cured, so this is clearly the second worst box to be in.
From my admittedly biased perspective, I believe we ID doctors who do inpatient consults are particularly linked to cases in Box 4.
You almost expect someone to call a consult with the specific query, “Hey, we have someone who’s not getting better, and we don’t know why [Box 4]. Can you help us out?”
But of course, it’s not just us ID types who see patients in this category — anyone who sees patients will recognize that disquieting feeling of caring for a patient who is worsening clinically without a diagnosis.
If we feel bad about Box 4, imagine how the patients and their families feel? In the movie, there’s a skillfully depicted scene soon after the main character is admitted to intensive care, where a series of specialists come by to talk to the family about what they think is going on, and why.
Since they don’t know the answer, and she’s critically ill, a predictable torrent of medical jargon ensues, only adding to the family’s anxiety. Unfortunately, Box 4 triggers amnesia for many of us on how to use plain English to describe things clearly to non-physicians.
To wrap up the rest of the Four States of Clinical Medicine, Box 2 (getting better, diagnosis unknown) is the stuff of everyday practice, especially in the outpatient setting. Scientific studies have conclusively shown that despite increasingly sophisticated diagnostic tests, 89.94% of clinical medicine is in Box 2.
(I made that up.)
A patient arrives with low back pain, which is disabling. There are no red flags — no fever, no weight loss, no worrisome past medical history, normal neurologic exam. One could do imaging, but even if abnormalities are found, who’s to say this is causing their pain?
And a couple of weeks later, it’s all gone. That’s Box 2.
And Box 1 (getting better, diagnosis known) is where we all want to be. These are the “great cases” for all involved, regardless of severity. In the summertime, consider the elderly avid gardener with fever, mental status changes, and thrombocytopenia — and after a few days of doxycycline for anaplasmosis, he’s all better.
Or the patient with weeks of anorexia, low grade fevers, and weight loss, where everyone is worried about cancer — until a couple of blood cultures are positive for alpha strep, and treatment for endocarditis reverses the whole process.
These are dramatic wins, gratifying for all, and why we do what we do. One could even argue that the joy and relief of being in Box 1 is so profound that one could justify the use of of novel diagnostic tests, even if it means identifying something for which we have no treatment.
How about the outpatient with a prolonged cold? These have been Box 2 patients (getting better over time, no specific diagnosis) since the beginning of medicine. Is it worth finding out they have rhinovirus just to move them into Box 1?
The quality-of-life boost might be that good.
Back to the movie — here are the bare bones of the plot, in case you haven’t seen it: An unlikely but very appealing young couple falls in love. Just as the relationship is getting serious, they have a break-up despite their obvious great chemistry. Shortly after they split, the woman develops a life-threatening illness, likely an infection of some sort.
There’s of course a lot more to it, but instead of spoiling the plot for everyone who hasn’t seen it, I want to highlight the reason it’s showing up in this ID blog — and it’s not just because of the word “infection” in the previous paragraph.
Guess in which box the character in The Big Sick ends up?
Hey, it’s a comedy. And seeing the movie made me very happy.
H/T to ID doc Tom O’Brien — yes, father of Conan! — for the concept, and to Anne Sax for the drawing.
Categories: Health Care, Infectious Diseases, Patient Care
Tags: movies, rapid viral diagnostics, The Big Sick
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
10 Responses to “The Four States of Clinical Medicine, and a Movie Review (Sort Of)”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Pages
Archives
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Categories
- Antiretroviral Rounds (21)
- Health Care (786)
- HIV (405)
- Infectious Diseases (619)
- Medical Education (129)
- Misc (55)
- Patient Care (522)
- Policy (230)
- Research (217)
- Uncategorized (1)
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster


Saw the movie a while ago – cute. Not yet a classic – but maybe more to come. . . .
I call Box #2 OOTT = One of Those Things. . . . .you may never know what it is/was – a headache (not a SAH), growing pains (not Ewings Sarcoma), and of course – our favourite – “a rash” – that came and went.
P.S. Box #1 does NOT confirm the diagnosis was correct – it only shows association – not causality (I believe is the scientifically correct term).
The man who was my veterinarian for many years was fond of saying that 80% of his patients got better despite what he did for them. I guess that would be Box 2!
Hi Paul,
Love Kumail Nangiani from his days on Portlandia. I thought she had MAS/HLH, not an infection.
I feel I spend a fair amount of time when doing consults in Boxes 2 & 3. I much rather be in 2. As you say, box 1 is the “sweat spot” we all aspire to never leave.
but the very most rewarding thing is when an ID doc moves a patient from box 4 to box 1 – doesn’t happen as often as I’d like but it makes the best stories!
I am a medical acupuncture physician in Australia in a Inner Regional Area (ie city docs won’t come here and “real” rural docs won’t either, so we are a District of Workforce Shortage. Until we got a sewerage plant and the centre of our small town connected we had an 8% incidence of diarrhoea diseases, including paediatric and geriatric deaths from Salmonella, Shigella, and near deaths from alleged non-pathogens like Blastocystis. Then we had an unexplained out break of a febrile illness with rash, arthritis, cognitive and affective symptoms that cross reacted with a Flavivirus screen, but was negative for Ross River and Barmah Forest Virus. The promised help from the State Government Health Inspectors never came, as they were busy with a whooping cough outbreak. So most of my cases are in Box 2, probably due to natural selection – anybody living in this district has to be tough or they will die!
Bill – been there – (in Australia too) – I feel your drain.
Great pun!
At the risk of over complicating, I would like to suggest a 3×3 table to further emphasize the uncertainty of clinical medicine. X-axis: Improving, Unchanged, Worse. Y-axis: Known Diagnosis, Possible/Probable Diagnosis(es), No Blinking Idea.
As a med student, I rounded with a “seasoned” physician. The patient and the family asked why is such and such was happening. The “seasoned ” physician stroked his chin thoughtfully and then said “sometimes we see that in cases like this”. Patient and family were satisfied. We walked out of the room and I said do we often see that in this problem. He said “I have no idea!”.