An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
July 11th, 2008
M184V: So many options, but does that include TDF/FTC/EFV?
Co-formulated TDF/FTC/EFV (Atripla) is a nifty bit of pharmacologic packaging (ever so much more so since it involves collaboration between two different pharmaceutical companies, ahem) — and our patients have noticed. All of us who practice HIV medicine have been asked for the “one pill” treatment; often these requests make sense, sometimes they don’t.
It’s easy to say when it’s a bad idea (known NNRTI resistance, for example), but sometimes it’s not so clear.
We presented a case in AIDS Clinical Care of someone with documented M184V several years previously (before a treatment interruption) who now needed to go back on treatment. Her request: the “one pill” treatment. One of our clinical experts (Joel Gallant) said he wouldn’t do it; the other (Jose Arribas) said he would. Not surprisingly, there were good reasons provided by both for their decisions.
We also asked if they’d order a viral tropism test. Joel — no. Jose — yes.
Thoughts? What do you do for patients who only have M184V?
Categories: Antiretroviral Rounds, HIV, Infectious Diseases, Patient Care
Tags: Atripla, M184V, TDF/FTC/EFV
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
4 Responses to “M184V: So many options, but does that include TDF/FTC/EFV?”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting
- SNAP Trial Helps Resolve Long-Running Controversies Over Management of Staph Bacteremia
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Farewell to This Blog — and Hello to NEJM Voices March 2, 2026
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting February 26, 2026
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing February 17, 2026
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being February 12, 2026
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Primary Measles Infection February 26, 2026A previously healthy man presented with a 5-day history of fever, nausea, and vomiting and a 2-day history of an itchy rash. Examination showed an exanthem consisting of minute macules and subtly elevated papules.
- Tecovirimat for the Treatment of Mpox February 26, 2026Mpox continues to spread in many communities. Tecovirimat has activity against orthopoxviruses in vitro. In a phase 3 trial involving patients with acute mpox, tecovirimat showed no evidence of clinical activity.
- Microbial Flora in War Wounds from the Ukrainian Front Line February 26, 2026Battlefield injuries are often contaminated with potentially infecting microbes. In this study, swabs obtained in the field after injury were profiled. Microbes and potential antimicrobial-resistance genes were characterized.
- AI-Enabled Precision-Education Systems — Transforming Lifelong Learning in Medicine February 26, 2026Trainees’ paths to safe, independent practice are variable. Artificial intelligence could help accelerate implementation of competency-based medical education to support individualized development.
- From Efficacy to Access in Long-Acting HIV Therapy February 26, 2026Over the past three decades, advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have dramatically improved life expectancy, decreased frailty, and improved quality of life for persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).1,2 These gains have accrued primarily among those who can reliably access health care and adhere to daily treatment. For...
- Primary Measles Infection February 26, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster

What about treating her once daily with Atripla + Ziagen —
Would adding abacavir give her the necessary “third drug” in this case and allow her to use Atripla as she desires?
Would the 184V affect the efficacy of the abacavir too much to make it worthwhile?
I would check the hl b 5701 and the trofle assay. If the b 5701 was negative, I would offer her atripla and ziagen. If positive, I would explore twice-daily regimens with her, including isentress, intelence and selzentry as possibilities.
I like Dr. Gallant’s response of ritonavir-boosted PI with tenofovir/FTC even with the M184V. However, instead of a “two-drug regimen,” I would call it a “two and 1/2 drug regimen,” and it makes a lot of sense to me. Perhaps more patients could benefit from this simple regimen.
I would urge the patient to restart therapy using a boosted protease inhibitor based regimen that would be simple (once a day) and relatively fat friendly (such as ritonavir/fosamprenavir or ritonavir/atazanavir or ritonavir/darunavir + Truvada or Epzicom -the latter if HLA B5701 negative). I would be tempted (if the patient was willing) to initially recommend use of another agent (such as raltegravir) to rapidly suppress HIV RNA levels to the detection level and then stop it out of concern about the presence of more extensive NRTI resistance than detected by the genotypic results available and not wanting to use potential monotherapy (just a boosted PI) in a treatment experienced patient with underlying NRTI resistance.