An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
July 11th, 2008
M184V: So many options, but does that include TDF/FTC/EFV?
Co-formulated TDF/FTC/EFV (Atripla) is a nifty bit of pharmacologic packaging (ever so much more so since it involves collaboration between two different pharmaceutical companies, ahem) — and our patients have noticed. All of us who practice HIV medicine have been asked for the “one pill” treatment; often these requests make sense, sometimes they don’t.
It’s easy to say when it’s a bad idea (known NNRTI resistance, for example), but sometimes it’s not so clear.
We presented a case in AIDS Clinical Care of someone with documented M184V several years previously (before a treatment interruption) who now needed to go back on treatment. Her request: the “one pill” treatment. One of our clinical experts (Joel Gallant) said he wouldn’t do it; the other (Jose Arribas) said he would. Not surprisingly, there were good reasons provided by both for their decisions.
We also asked if they’d order a viral tropism test. Joel — no. Jose — yes.
Thoughts? What do you do for patients who only have M184V?
Categories: Antiretroviral Rounds, HIV, Infectious Diseases, Patient Care
Tags: Atripla, M184V, TDF/FTC/EFV
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
4 Responses to “M184V: So many options, but does that include TDF/FTC/EFV?”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
Sorry. No data so far.
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Farewell to This Blog — and Hello to NEJM Voices March 2, 2026
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting February 26, 2026
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing February 17, 2026
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being February 12, 2026
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Andes Hantavirus Outbreak on a Cruise Ship, 2026 June 25, 2026On May 2, hantavirus infection was diagnosed in a patient who had been on a cruise ship. Subsequent evaluation revealed multiple cases of Andes hantavirus infection on the ship. To date, three associated deaths have occurred.
- Phase 3 Results of Bepirovirsen Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection June 25, 2026In two phase 3 trials, 19% of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection had a functional cure with the antisense oligonucleotide bepirovirsen, 24 weeks after stopping all HBV treatment; functional cure was not seen with placebo.
- Clusters of Concern — Spatial Link between Childhood Undervaccination and Measles Outbreaks in South Carolina June 25, 2026Spatial analysis in South Carolina revealed that measles infections were clustered in areas where public school vaccination rates were lower.
- Improving Global Air-Quality Indices — The WHO’s New Roadmap June 25, 2026Many countries rely on air-quality indices to inform the public and help protect people during short-term increases in air pollution. Their use has important societal and economic implications.
- A Major Step toward a Cure for Hepatitis B Infection June 25, 2026The current treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection includes nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA) therapy and pegylated interferon. Both of these treatments are effective in suppressing hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and in reducing the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.1 However, these treatments do not eradicate HBV,...
- Andes Hantavirus Outbreak on a Cruise Ship, 2026 June 25, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster

What about treating her once daily with Atripla + Ziagen —
Would adding abacavir give her the necessary “third drug” in this case and allow her to use Atripla as she desires?
Would the 184V affect the efficacy of the abacavir too much to make it worthwhile?
I would check the hl b 5701 and the trofle assay. If the b 5701 was negative, I would offer her atripla and ziagen. If positive, I would explore twice-daily regimens with her, including isentress, intelence and selzentry as possibilities.
I like Dr. Gallant’s response of ritonavir-boosted PI with tenofovir/FTC even with the M184V. However, instead of a “two-drug regimen,” I would call it a “two and 1/2 drug regimen,” and it makes a lot of sense to me. Perhaps more patients could benefit from this simple regimen.
I would urge the patient to restart therapy using a boosted protease inhibitor based regimen that would be simple (once a day) and relatively fat friendly (such as ritonavir/fosamprenavir or ritonavir/atazanavir or ritonavir/darunavir + Truvada or Epzicom -the latter if HLA B5701 negative). I would be tempted (if the patient was willing) to initially recommend use of another agent (such as raltegravir) to rapidly suppress HIV RNA levels to the detection level and then stop it out of concern about the presence of more extensive NRTI resistance than detected by the genotypic results available and not wanting to use potential monotherapy (just a boosted PI) in a treatment experienced patient with underlying NRTI resistance.