An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
June 16th, 2009
Q: What is the Purpose of a Note in the Patient Chart?
A: Depends who you’re asking.
The best guidance I ever received on how to write a good note came from my residency program director, who told us that a note needn’t be encyclopedic to be excellent; in fact, he urged us to get away from the “second-year medical student” style, which typically includes absolutely everything.
Instead, he urged us to write, as concisely as possible, notes that included the following:
- What is going on with the patient
- Why we think so
- What we’re going to do about it
All this gets thrown on its head, however, when you get an email like this one:
Hello Dr. Sax,
Just a reminder that I will be meeting with you to discuss your billing audit results on Thursday 5:30 pm, right after your outpatient session is completed.
Judy
In this meeting, I predict Judy will tell me that the occasional visit I coded as “Level 5” really should have been “Level 4”, or even “Level 3” — since even though the case was incredibly complicated and involved reviewing years of treatment history, lab results, and prolonged communication with outside providers and the patient and his family members, I somehow neglected to include the requisite # of “Review of Systems” (10 required), with explicit mention of past, family, and social history, as well as a 9-system physical exam. Oh, and the sentence: “Time spent reviewing impression and plan with patient and family: — minutes.”
Yes, abuses by MDs and hospitals on billing have been well documented. Cases like this one are obviously serious, and cannot be condoned. It could be argued that these periodic “compliance reviews” (my session this week with Judy) are merely the just rewards of a previously unpoliced system.
But does anyone think that the current rules we have in place — with these explicit guidelines for what constitutes a complex case based on who knows what (“Review of Systems?” c’mon!) — is anything other than an invitation to game the system with fancy software, macros, templates, lots of copy-and-paste, and other such tricks?
And what happened to what should be the primary purpose of the note — which is to communicate the critical items of the medical encounter?
That’s the saddest part — it’s gone.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Interactive Perspective: Measles December 18, 2025This Double Take video reviews evidence-based recommendations on measles prevention and management and explores commonly asked questions about the measles virus and infection.
- Noninferiority of One HPV Vaccine Dose to Two Doses December 18, 2025In this trial, one dose of an HPV vaccine was noninferior to two doses in preventing HPV type 16 or 18 infection.
- From Crisis to Action — Policy Pathways to Reverse the Rise in Congenital Syphilis December 18, 2025In recent years, cases of congenital syphilis have surged. This trend reflects both prenatal care gaps and systemic issues, including failures in testing, treatment, and public health infrastructure.
- Contact Precautions for MRSA and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus December 18, 2025This feature about the use of contact precautions in the hospital for patients with MRSA or VRE offers a case vignette accompanied by two essays, one supporting continuing the use of contact precautions and the other recommending discontinuing them.
- Evidence to Action — Single-Dose HPV Vaccination and Cervical HPV Infection December 18, 2025Kreimer and colleagues now report in the Journal1 the results of the ESCUDDO trial, which showed that the efficacy of a single dose of either a bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine or a nonavalent formulation was similar to that of the standard two-dose schedule. This randomized trial...
- Interactive Perspective: Measles December 18, 2025