An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
October 29th, 2011
Will An Antiretroviral Patch Help Adherence? Doubtful …
This little nugget came up recently, found by our Journal Watch Executive Editor:
Preliminary research suggests that a patch could deliver an AIDS drug to patients … The researchers successfully used transdermal patches to administer 96 percent of an AIDS drug to simulated skin over a week. “Still, the important limitation of pills, regardless of how few there are or even how minimal the side effects, is adherence,” Johnston [the investigator] noted. Research has shown that many patients, if not most, don’t take their pills all the time.
Setting aside for a moment the fact that most patients actually do take their medications just fine, thank you — and that this particular transdermal HIV drug delivery system hasn’t even been tested on animals, let alone humans — I have always wondered about the assumption that novel drug delivery systems would improve adherence.
Seems to me that the major problem with non-adherent patients isn’t that they can’t take pills.
It’s that they won’t take them.
And I strongly suspect that most would make the same choice when it comes to putting on a patch every day (or even every week).
Categories: HIV, Patient Care, Research
Tags: antiretroviral therapy, drug delivery systems, HIV
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “Will An Antiretroviral Patch Help Adherence? Doubtful …”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing
- SNAP Trial Helps Resolve Long-Running Controversies Over Management of Staph Bacteremia
- How the Z-Pak Took Over Outpatient Medicine
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Farewell to This Blog — and Hello to NEJM Voices March 2, 2026
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting February 26, 2026
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing February 17, 2026
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being February 12, 2026
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Communicating about Vaccines in a Politically Contentious Climate March 21, 2026Recent changes in U.S. vaccine policy are sowing confusion and threatening the health of children and the wider population. How should pediatric clinicians communicate with parents to stem the damage?
- Massive Intravascular Hemolysis from Clostridium perfringens Bacteremia March 12, 2026A 73-year-old woman presented in shock with a 1-day history of malaise, dyspnea, and confusion. Serum samples could not be processed owing to gross hemolysis. Dehemoglobinized red cells and bacilli were seen on a peripheral-blood smear.
- Postpartum Persistence of Ebola Virus in Breast Milk March 12, 2026To control EBOV outbreaks, defining potential sanctuary sites where the virus may persist and lead to transmission is important. In this report, persistence of EBOV RNA in breast milk was identified and characterized.
- Case 8-2026: A 57-Year-Old Woman with Chest Pain, Dyspnea, and Syncope March 12, 2026A 57-year-old woman was evaluated because of 2 days of chest pain and dyspnea. Ultrasonography showed a pericardial effusion with diastolic inversion of the right ventricle. A diagnosis was made.
- Soft Tick Relapsing Fever March 12, 2026A 74-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a 3-week history of intermittent fevers, muscle aches, and vomiting. Thin blood smears showed spirochetes.
- Communicating about Vaccines in a Politically Contentious Climate March 21, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster

Perhaps most patients in that Baltimore, MD study take their medications just fine… what about those at high risk for nonadherence? Putting on a patch once a week (perhaps supervised during a home visit by a health worker) could be a real improvement over twice-daily pills for some PLH whom I have encountered in a developing country setting. It could certainly be easier for those with a variable sleep or work schedule. I think it would be a simpler option for me if I were on ART.
Hi Amy,
Agree it might be handy … for those who agree to do it!
I also think that Baltimore study is pretty representative of a very challenging group of patients — here’s my review of it:
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/6/605.full
My rough estimate is that around 10-20% of HIV patients don’t take their meds, but they loom very large in our minds since we spend so much time agonizing over them!
Paul