An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
October 29th, 2011
Will An Antiretroviral Patch Help Adherence? Doubtful …
This little nugget came up recently, found by our Journal Watch Executive Editor:
Preliminary research suggests that a patch could deliver an AIDS drug to patients … The researchers successfully used transdermal patches to administer 96 percent of an AIDS drug to simulated skin over a week. “Still, the important limitation of pills, regardless of how few there are or even how minimal the side effects, is adherence,” Johnston [the investigator] noted. Research has shown that many patients, if not most, don’t take their pills all the time.
Setting aside for a moment the fact that most patients actually do take their medications just fine, thank you — and that this particular transdermal HIV drug delivery system hasn’t even been tested on animals, let alone humans — I have always wondered about the assumption that novel drug delivery systems would improve adherence.
Seems to me that the major problem with non-adherent patients isn’t that they can’t take pills.
It’s that they won’t take them.
And I strongly suspect that most would make the same choice when it comes to putting on a patch every day (or even every week).
Categories: HIV, Patient Care, Research
Tags: antiretroviral therapy, drug delivery systems, HIV
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “Will An Antiretroviral Patch Help Adherence? Doubtful …”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
Sorry. No data so far.
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Farewell to This Blog — and Hello to NEJM Voices March 2, 2026
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting February 26, 2026
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing February 17, 2026
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being February 12, 2026
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Shock Not Advised April 30, 2026A physician offers to help in a medical emergency on a transatlantic flight. Though she faces limits of bureaucracy, equipment, and ultimately biology, she discovers her physicianhood is inescapable.
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis Detection with MiniDock MTB Using Swab Samples April 30, 2026Rapid, affordable, and easy-to-use diagnostic testing for tuberculosis is needed. In a multinational study, the accuracy of a tuberculosis diagnostic deployable to peripheral health care centers was assessed.
- Legislating Medicine — Directed Donation and the Politics of Patient Choice April 30, 2026A Tennessee bill focused on directed blood donation exemplifies a pattern of efforts to legislate medical practice in ways that override scientific consensus while invoking the language of autonomy.
- Tackling Maternal Sepsis — Doing the Basics, and Doing Them Well April 30, 2026In the mid-19th century, the Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis’s observations and theories about the transfer of “cadaverous particles” on the hands of doctors led to the development of hygiene protocols, such as hand washing with chlorine, which resulted in a reduction in maternal mortality associated with puerperal fever.1,2 ...
- Case 13-2026: A 76-Year-Old Woman with Fatigue, Rash, and Kidney Failure April 30, 2026A 76-year-old woman, who had a history of treated hepatitis C virus infection, presented with rapidly progressive kidney failure and a stroke. Palpable purpura on the legs was noted. A diagnosis was made.
- Shock Not Advised April 30, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster

Perhaps most patients in that Baltimore, MD study take their medications just fine… what about those at high risk for nonadherence? Putting on a patch once a week (perhaps supervised during a home visit by a health worker) could be a real improvement over twice-daily pills for some PLH whom I have encountered in a developing country setting. It could certainly be easier for those with a variable sleep or work schedule. I think it would be a simpler option for me if I were on ART.
Hi Amy,
Agree it might be handy … for those who agree to do it!
I also think that Baltimore study is pretty representative of a very challenging group of patients — here’s my review of it:
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/6/605.full
My rough estimate is that around 10-20% of HIV patients don’t take their meds, but they loom very large in our minds since we spend so much time agonizing over them!
Paul