An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
January 29th, 2009
Too Many Options: What Actually Happened
We recently published a case in AIDS Clinical Care entitled “Too Many Options”, describing a patient with longstanding HIV infection, virologic failure, and resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs.
Fortunately, resistance and tropism testing gave him several options for a new drug regimen — including darunavir, etravirine, maraviroc, enfuvirtide, and — if one believes phenotypic NRTI susceptibility with multiple TAMs — several NRTIs.
And what did our three experts suggest? Three different regimens:
- Sharon Walmsley: darunavir/r, maraviroc, and etravirine (three drugs — not counting ritonavir)
- Tim Wilkin: darunavir/r, raltegravir, maraviroc, and tenofovir/FTC (five drugs)
- Graeme Moyle: darunavir/r, raltegravir, and maraviroc (three drugs, but different from Sharon’s selection)
Now these are smart, highly-experienced clinicians, physicians who are active in clinical research, know the literature extremely well, and actually see patients. (Funny how that last part is sometimes left out.) Each of them provided sound reasons for their (varying) choices.
And what did we do with this patient? (Or one very much like him … obviously some details changed as per HIPAA mandate.)
We offered him the chance to enroll in the clinical study ACTG 5241 (mentioned by Tim), which takes patients like this, gives them an optimal regimen — then randomizes them to receive or not to receive NRTIs.
(I don’t think it will ruin the study to mention that the “flip of the coin” gave him the “No Nukes” option.)
I sure hope we learn something from this study. While we know that regimens should contain “two (preferably three)” active agents, beyond that there’s plenty of uncertainty out there.
2 Responses to “Too Many Options: What Actually Happened”
Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Postpartum Persistence of Ebola Virus in Breast Milk March 12, 2026To control EBOV outbreaks, defining potential sanctuary sites where the virus may persist and lead to transmission is important. In this report, persistence of EBOV RNA in breast milk was identified and characterized.
- Soft Tick Relapsing Fever March 12, 2026A 74-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a 3-week history of intermittent fevers, muscle aches, and vomiting. Thin blood smears showed spirochetes.
- Case 8-2026: A 57-Year-Old Woman with Chest Pain, Dyspnea, and Syncope March 12, 2026A 57-year-old woman was evaluated because of 2 days of chest pain and dyspnea. Ultrasonography showed a pericardial effusion with diastolic inversion of the right ventricle. A diagnosis was made.
- Massive Intravascular Hemolysis from Clostridium perfringens Bacteremia March 12, 2026A 73-year-old woman presented in shock with a 1-day history of malaise, dyspnea, and confusion. Serum samples could not be processed owing to gross hemolysis. Dehemoglobinized red cells and bacilli were seen on a peripheral-blood smear.
- The Eyes Have It March 5, 2026A 47-year-old man was brought to the ED by EMS after being found dyspneic in his car. He reported having been drinking for 6 hours before presentation. He noted a sensation of tongue swelling and difficulty breathing.
- Postpartum Persistence of Ebola Virus in Breast Milk March 12, 2026
Fortunately, we can choose from 5 active drugs outside of the NRTI class: boosted darunavir (only 2 primary mutations, 33f, 84v), maraviroc, raltegravir, and etravirine. While Fuzeon would also be effective, I would not use an injectable since we have more convenient oral options. This seems like an ideal situation for maraviroc since the virus is CCR5 tropic. I would add two other agents–boosted darunavir and etravirine, saving raltegravir as a back up in case of drug side effect, like etravirine rash.
What I’ve done with similar patients in my practice was to put them on:
1. etravirine
2. maraviroc
3. raltegravir
This adds up to 5 pills twice a day. The patient’s virus(es) has not been exposed to any of these drugs and you do not need to use a PI/r. This has worked great for my patients!