An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
January 29th, 2009
Too Many Options: What Actually Happened
We recently published a case in AIDS Clinical Care entitled “Too Many Options”, describing a patient with longstanding HIV infection, virologic failure, and resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs.
Fortunately, resistance and tropism testing gave him several options for a new drug regimen — including darunavir, etravirine, maraviroc, enfuvirtide, and — if one believes phenotypic NRTI susceptibility with multiple TAMs — several NRTIs.
And what did our three experts suggest? Three different regimens:
- Sharon Walmsley: darunavir/r, maraviroc, and etravirine (three drugs — not counting ritonavir)
- Tim Wilkin: darunavir/r, raltegravir, maraviroc, and tenofovir/FTC (five drugs)
- Graeme Moyle: darunavir/r, raltegravir, and maraviroc (three drugs, but different from Sharon’s selection)
Now these are smart, highly-experienced clinicians, physicians who are active in clinical research, know the literature extremely well, and actually see patients. (Funny how that last part is sometimes left out.) Each of them provided sound reasons for their (varying) choices.
And what did we do with this patient? (Or one very much like him … obviously some details changed as per HIPAA mandate.)
We offered him the chance to enroll in the clinical study ACTG 5241 (mentioned by Tim), which takes patients like this, gives them an optimal regimen — then randomizes them to receive or not to receive NRTIs.
(I don’t think it will ruin the study to mention that the “flip of the coin” gave him the “No Nukes” option.)
I sure hope we learn something from this study. While we know that regimens should contain “two (preferably three)” active agents, beyond that there’s plenty of uncertainty out there.
Categories: Antiretroviral Rounds, HIV, Infectious Diseases, Patient Care
Tags: AIDS, ART, clinical care, darunavir, enfuvirtide, etravirine, graeme moyle, HIV, hiv infection, maraviroc, NRTIs, raltegravir, regimens, resistance, ritonavir, tenofovir, tim wilkin, walmsley
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “Too Many Options: What Actually Happened”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
Sorry. No data so far.
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Farewell to This Blog — and Hello to NEJM Voices March 2, 2026
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting February 26, 2026
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing February 17, 2026
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being February 12, 2026
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Anticompetitive Mergers — Pharmaceutical Buyouts as a Strategy for Maintaining Market Dominance April 18, 2026Consolidation in drug markets could promote availability of innovative treatments. But current antitrust screening is inadequate for detecting anticompetitive behavior, including “killer acquisitions.”
- Risk of Guillain–Barré Syndrome after Laboratory-Confirmed Dengue Infection April 16, 2026In a Brazilian self-controlled case series of 5055 hospitalizations for Guillain–Barré syndrome, laboratory-confirmed dengue was associated with an increased risk of Guillain–Barré syndrome occurring within 42 days.
- Nurse Scientists as Trusted Voices in Health Communication April 16, 2026Despite the erosion of public confidence in science and medicine, nurses remain highly trusted professionals. Integrating nurse scientists into health communication strategies would benefit public health.
- Intraosseous Abscess from Subacute Osteomyelitis April 16, 2026A 16-year-old girl presented with 1 month of ankle pain and 11 days of fever. Radiographs showed an ill-defined, radiolucent distal tibial lesion; on MRI, the lesion was hypointense and surrounded by a hyperintense sclerotic rim.
- The Dismantling of Environmental Protections — A Grave Threat to America’s Health April 16, 2026The Trump administration’s wide-ranging actions to dismantle U.S. environmental regulations will cause long-lasting health harms, disproportionately affecting low-income and other vulnerable groups.
- Anticompetitive Mergers — Pharmaceutical Buyouts as a Strategy for Maintaining Market Dominance April 18, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster


Fortunately, we can choose from 5 active drugs outside of the NRTI class: boosted darunavir (only 2 primary mutations, 33f, 84v), maraviroc, raltegravir, and etravirine. While Fuzeon would also be effective, I would not use an injectable since we have more convenient oral options. This seems like an ideal situation for maraviroc since the virus is CCR5 tropic. I would add two other agents–boosted darunavir and etravirine, saving raltegravir as a back up in case of drug side effect, like etravirine rash.
What I’ve done with similar patients in my practice was to put them on:
1. etravirine
2. maraviroc
3. raltegravir
This adds up to 5 pills twice a day. The patient’s virus(es) has not been exposed to any of these drugs and you do not need to use a PI/r. This has worked great for my patients!