An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
January 29th, 2009
Too Many Options: What Actually Happened
We recently published a case in AIDS Clinical Care entitled “Too Many Options”, describing a patient with longstanding HIV infection, virologic failure, and resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs.
Fortunately, resistance and tropism testing gave him several options for a new drug regimen — including darunavir, etravirine, maraviroc, enfuvirtide, and — if one believes phenotypic NRTI susceptibility with multiple TAMs — several NRTIs.
And what did our three experts suggest? Three different regimens:
- Sharon Walmsley: darunavir/r, maraviroc, and etravirine (three drugs — not counting ritonavir)
- Tim Wilkin: darunavir/r, raltegravir, maraviroc, and tenofovir/FTC (five drugs)
- Graeme Moyle: darunavir/r, raltegravir, and maraviroc (three drugs, but different from Sharon’s selection)
Now these are smart, highly-experienced clinicians, physicians who are active in clinical research, know the literature extremely well, and actually see patients. (Funny how that last part is sometimes left out.) Each of them provided sound reasons for their (varying) choices.
And what did we do with this patient? (Or one very much like him … obviously some details changed as per HIPAA mandate.)
We offered him the chance to enroll in the clinical study ACTG 5241 (mentioned by Tim), which takes patients like this, gives them an optimal regimen — then randomizes them to receive or not to receive NRTIs.
(I don’t think it will ruin the study to mention that the “flip of the coin” gave him the “No Nukes” option.)
I sure hope we learn something from this study. While we know that regimens should contain “two (preferably three)” active agents, beyond that there’s plenty of uncertainty out there.
2 Responses to “Too Many Options: What Actually Happened”
Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Clinical Characteristics of Patients Infected with Bundibugyo Virus, DRC 2026 August 6, 2026Bundibugyo virus, a filovirus, is currently spreading in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This report presents early data on symptoms and illness severity as well as diagnostic challenges.
- Ebola at 50 — Lessons for Outbreak Response and Preparedness August 6, 2026An accurate history of Ebola begins with partnerships, including those between responders and the populations they serve. One of its key lessons is that equity must be integral to outbreak preparedness.
- Cross-Reactive Bundibugyo Antibody Responses after Receipt of Licensed Ebola Vaccines August 6, 2026The Bundibugyo virus outbreak in the DRC and Uganda has focused concern on potential countermeasures. Investigators assessed cross-reactive immune responses in serum obtained during previous Ebola vaccine trials.
- The Inequality–Pandemic Cycle — Rethinking Preparedness August 6, 2026Increasing pandemic frequency and increasing economic inequality are creating a self-reinforcing cycle. What’s needed is therefore a new, inequality-informed approach to pandemic preparedness.
- The Social Contract of Bundibugyo Ebola Isolation August 6, 2026The lack of vaccines and disease-specific therapeutics for Bundibugyo Ebola has dramatically affected the community’s perception of Ebola treatment centers. In this context, trust becomes critical.
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients Infected with Bundibugyo Virus, DRC 2026 August 6, 2026
Fortunately, we can choose from 5 active drugs outside of the NRTI class: boosted darunavir (only 2 primary mutations, 33f, 84v), maraviroc, raltegravir, and etravirine. While Fuzeon would also be effective, I would not use an injectable since we have more convenient oral options. This seems like an ideal situation for maraviroc since the virus is CCR5 tropic. I would add two other agents–boosted darunavir and etravirine, saving raltegravir as a back up in case of drug side effect, like etravirine rash.
What I’ve done with similar patients in my practice was to put them on:
1. etravirine
2. maraviroc
3. raltegravir
This adds up to 5 pills twice a day. The patient’s virus(es) has not been exposed to any of these drugs and you do not need to use a PI/r. This has worked great for my patients!