An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
November 30th, 2009
WHO HIV Treatment Guidelines Updated
This just in:
WHO is now recommending that ART be initiated at a higher CD4 threshold of 350 cells/mm3 for all HIV-positive patients, including pregnant women, regardless of symptoms.
Which makes eminent sense, of course. Because if starting HIV therapy might prolong survival in developed countries, why shouldn’t it do the same in the developing world?
In fact, when you consider the higher incidence of TB and invasive bacterial infections in such settings, it could easily be argued — and has been argued — that starting early would net greater survival gains in resource-poor settings than it would here.
Plus, there’s the CIPRAHT001 Study, which proves it.
But there’s more — the new WHO guidelines also urge that countries “phase out” the use of stavudine in favor of less-toxic NRTIs, and that women continue breastfeeding so long as they are also on ART.
Good news all around.
Categories: Health Care, HIV, Patient Care, Policy
Tags: AIDS, antiretroviral therapy, antiretrovirals, ART, guidelines, HIV, hiv treatment, Infectious Diseases, WHO
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “WHO HIV Treatment Guidelines Updated”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Associate Editor
NEJM Clinician
Biography | Disclosures & Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
Most Popular Posts
Sorry. No data so far.
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- Farewell to This Blog — and Hello to NEJM Voices March 2, 2026
- Some Ruminations on CROI — Still the Best HIV Meeting February 26, 2026
- Two Things Can Be True: The FDA Process Was Inconsistent, and the mRNA Vaccine Data Were Disappointing February 17, 2026
- Sometimes You Just Need to Get Input from a Real Human Being February 12, 2026
- Mystifying Abbreviations — Infectious Diseases Edition February 4, 2026
FROM NEJM — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- The End of the War on Biomedical Science? September 19, 2026The turmoil of the past 20 months has inflicted lasting damage on American science and public health. But history and recent events suggest that the attacks will subside.
- Cerebral Schistosomiasis September 19, 2026A rice farmer presented to the ED after a 1-minute episode of arm and leg shaking on the right side. MRI showed linear enhancement associated with a cluster of enhancing nodules and surrounding edema in the left frontal lobe.
- Human Adenovirus B3–Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis September 17, 2026Virus-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis after HAdV-B3 infection supports a shared platelet factor 4–targeted immune mechanism linking natural adenovirus infection and adenoviral vector–associated disease.
- Honoring the Legacy of the HIV Epidemic September 17, 2026Progress against the U.S. HIV epidemic is stalling, owing in part to government attacks and fear. But clinicians, patients, and activists can learn from the epidemic’s early heroes and find ways to advance.
- Short or Long Antibiotic Regimens in Orthopedics September 16, 2026In a randomized trial involving adults who received local antibiotics during surgery for orthopedic infection, a short duration of systemic antibiotics was noninferior to a long duration regarding treatment failure at 12 months.
- The End of the War on Biomedical Science? September 19, 2026
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster

Should the guidelines have suggested initiation at < 500 as is expected in the next iteration of US centered guidelines? Although ARVs are limited in many parts of the world should an individual patient be witheld therapy when there is an accumulation of data suggesting 500 (or higher) may be the tipping point? A conundrum in areas where supplies of ARVs are limited perhaps.
CM,
I guess one way of looking at “start at CD4 350” is “start at CD4 > 350.” I realize it’s not exactly the same thing, but since you can’t predict when or if the CD4 will drop, as a pt approaches this threshold (i.e., between 350 and 500), it’s time to get ready to start.
As you know, DHHS guidelines just out as well.
Paul